The Social Security Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA) Forecast for 2026 Was Just Updated. It’s Bad News and Worse News for Retirees.

Social Security is generally the largest source of income in retirement, but many seniors think benefits have fallen behind inflation. The Motley Fool last year surveyed 2,000 retired workers, and the majority said the cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) in 2024 and 2025 failed to keep up with rising prices.

Unfortunately, beneficiaries will likely receive an even smaller raise next year. The Senior Citizens League, a nonpartisan advocacy group, recently revised its 2026 COLA forecast down to 2.2%. Retired workers have not received a smaller pay increase since 2021. But there may be worse news in store for beneficiaries.

Here are the important details.

How Social Security’s cost-of-living adjustments are calculated

Retired workers on Social Security get annual cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) designed to ensure benefit payments increase in lockstep with inflation. Those COLAs are based on a subset of the Consumer Price Index known as the CPI-W, which measures price changes based on the spending patterns of hourly workers.

The math is simple: The third-quarter CPI-W from the current year (July through September) is divided by the third-quarter CPI-W from the prior year, and the percent increase becomes the COLA in the following year. For example, the CPI-W increased 2.5% in the third quarter of 2024, so Social Security benefits received a 2.5% COLA in 2025.

Why the latest COLA forecast is bad news for retirees on Social Security

CPI-W inflation measured 2.7% in February, down from 3% in January. That led The Senior Citizens League (TSCL) to lower its 2026 COLA forecast from 2.3% to 2.2%. But that alone is not a problem because COLAs simply compensate beneficiaries for rising prices. Put differently, the size of the COLA is irrelevant so long as it matches inflation.

The issue lies in the fact that Social Security’s COLAs are based on CPI-W inflation. As mentioned, the CPI-W measures price changes based on the spending habits of hourly employees. But working adults are typically younger than retirees on Social Security, and young people spend money differently than seniors.

How Social Security’s cost-of-living adjustments are calculated

Retired workers on Social Security get annual cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) designed to ensure benefit payments increase in lockstep with inflation. Those COLAs are based on a subset of the Consumer Price Index known as the CPI-W, which measures price changes based on the spending patterns of hourly workers.

The math is simple: The third-quarter CPI-W from the current year (July through September) is divided by the third-quarter CPI-W from the prior year, and the percent increase becomes the COLA in the following year. For example, the CPI-W increased 2.5% in the third quarter of 2024, so Social Security benefits received a 2.5% COLA in 2025.

Why the latest COLA forecast is bad news for retirees on Social Security

CPI-W inflation measured 2.7% in February, down from 3% in January. That led The Senior Citizens League (TSCL) to lower its 2026 COLA forecast from 2.3% to 2.2%. But that alone is not a problem because COLAs simply compensate beneficiaries for rising prices. Put differently, the size of the COLA is irrelevant so long as it matches inflation.

The issue lies in the fact that Social Security’s COLAs are based on CPI-W inflation. As mentioned, the CPI-W measures price changes based on the spending habits of hourly employees. But working adults are typically younger than retirees on Social Security, and young people spend money differently than seniors.

Alphabet to buy Wiz for $32 billion in its biggest deal to boost cloud security

Alphabet (GOOGL.O), opens new tab will buy fast-growing startup Wiz for about $32 billion in its biggest deal ever, the Google parent said Tuesday, as it doubles down on cybersecurity to sharpen its edge in the cloud-computing race against Amazon.com and Microsoft.

The blockbuster deal will make Wiz part of Google’s cloud unit and strengthen the company’s efforts in cybersecurity solutions that companies use to remove critical risks.

Its high price and unusually big breakup fee suggest Alphabet is comfortable that the buy will pass muster with the White House, even as the Trump administration has inserted itself into major deals and promised heavy scrutiny of Big Tech.
Shares of Alphabet dipped nearly 3%. The stock was down 13% this year before Tuesday on worries over its hefty AI spending against the rise of China’s lower-cost DeepSeek and a pullback in tech giants that led the market for the past two years.
To nail down the acquisition, Alphabet had to agree to a heavier price than last year’s $23 billion bid for Wiz, which the Israeli startup had rejected.
It was valued at $12 billion in a private funding round last May, with more than $500 million in annual recurring revenue as of mid-2024.
Sources said the two parties have kept in contact even after Wiz’s rejection last year, as Google Cloud CEO Thomas Kurian remained consistent in his pursuit.
The talks picked pace in the past two months after Donald Trump returned to the White House, sources said, requesting anonymity to discuss private matters.
Trump has said he would continue heavy scrutiny on Big Tech, which began during his first term, though Wall Street expects a shift in antitrust policies under the president, whose pick to lead the Federal Trade Commission, Andrew Ferguson, may dial back on big M&A regulation.
Wiz works with cloud providers such as Amazon Web Services, Microsoft’s Azure as well as Google Cloud and counts Morgan Stanley (MS.N), opens new tab, BMW (BMWG.DE), opens new tab and LVMH (LVMH.PA), opens new tab among its customers.
Wiz’s products will continue to be available across other major cloud services. Alphabet expects the deal to close in 2026, subject to regulatory approvals.
“There will likely be a microscope on the deal by investors, given Google’s lackluster historical track record with its capital allocation plan, specifically around M&A,” said Dave Wagner, portfolio manager at Aptus Capital Advisors.
Google’s cloud unit generated more than $40 billion in revenue in 2024 and has outpaced growth in the company’s search business in recent years.
D.A. Davidson analyst Gil Luria said the higher price is based on another year of exponential growth for Wiz.
“For Google to be able to compete with Microsoft Azure for enterprise customers, it needs to be able to offer a deeper suite of services, including security software,” he said.
Wiz has agreed to a termination fee of more than $3.2 billion, a source told Reuters, one of the highest fees in M&A history.
Interest in the cybersecurity industry has risen since last year’s global CrowdStrike (CRWD.O), opens new tab outage roiled operations across industries, prompting companies to spend more on safeguarding their online domains.
The latest deal is another sign that Israel’s cybersecurity industry punches well above its weight.
Several security companies based in Israel or founded by Israelis have been acquired by Silicon Valley giants, including Siemplify, which was bought by Alphabet in 2022, and Own, which Salesforce acquired in 2024.
Back in 2015, Wiz’s founders sold cloud security firm Adallom to Microsoft.

REGULATORY CONCERNS

Google has emphasized that Wiz would continue working with competing cloud platforms — potentially in a bid to head off regulatory concerns.
Interoperability has been a major theme in recent antitrust cases, including the U.S. Department of Justice’s existing case over Google’s ad tech. The FTC is pursuing an antitrust investigation into Microsoft’s cloud computing business.
“Generally speaking, Google is not a leader in the cloud business, and Wiz will still be available on all other cloud services,” said Elise Phillips, policy counsel at Public Knowledge, a public interest advocacy group.
“Any type of exclusivity agreement between the two of them down the line would give me cause for concern.”
The DOJ is pushing for measures, including a sale of its Chrome browser, to address what a judge said was an illegal search monopoly.
“This (deal) will be a big test for pro-business advocates,” said Aptus Capital’s Wagner.
Google had $23.47 billion in cash and cash equivalents as of Dec. 31, implying it might have to seek financing for the deal.
Social Security will pay up to $2,000 to these individuals on March 19

Beneficiaries of the US Social Security system are in luck. It has already been confirmed that the Administration will issue a payment of up to $2,000 to certain individuals, scheduled for March 19th, including retirees and individuals who are part of the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI).

In this sense, the American Social Security has confirmed that payments are issued according to the beneficiaries’ dates of birth. Therefore, it follows that those who were born between the 1st and the 10th of any month receive the money on the second Wednesday of the month; those who were born between the 11th and the 20th get it on the third; and those from the 21st to the 31st get it on the last day of the month. On the other hand, workers who retired before May 1997 and beneficiaries of the SSI do not follow this payment schedule, as the Administration sends them the money in the first days of the month.

People who will receive $2,000 from Social Security

According to information provided by the United States Public Administration, on March 19th thousands of Social Security beneficiaries will receive a significant amount of money in their bank accounts. Thus, people who are registered with this institution and who have met the established requirements may be recipients of this amount.

Thus, as reported by Social Security and according to the distribution calendar and the SSA estimates table, this Wednesday, March 19, retirees born between the 11th and the 20th of the month will receive an average payment of $2,000. This leaves only one payment left for the third month of the year, which will be made to people born between the 21st and the 31st and will be issued on March 26th.

Therefore, according to Social Security, the month of March will end with good news for Social Security beneficiaries, especially for retirees who are registered as pensioners in the United States Public Administration.

Average payment for Social Security retirees

The amount of the payments varies according to the history and case of each beneficiary. However, the SSA has estimates and simulators that allow people, whether single or families, to better plan for their retirement. In this way, based on the years worked and the age of retirement, it is possible to make an initial estimate of the amount that each worker will receive.

However, according to official information, the average payment for a worker who retires in 2025 is $1,976 per month and up to $3,089 for couples. However, the exact amount depends on several factors, such as the number of years of contributions to the system and the retirement age, among others. Otherwise, beneficiaries of the US Social Security have average payments of $967 if they are individuals and $1,450 if they are couples who declare jointly, as reported by the Administration.

Alphabet back in talks to buy Israel’s Wiz for over $30 billion, source says

Google-parent Alphabet is in advanced negotiations to buy Israeli cybersecurity company Wiz with an offer of more than $30 billion, according to a source familiar with the matter, marking its largest potential acquisition to date.

Alphabet’s latest offer is higher by roughly a third of the $23 billion deal it offered last year, which Wiz called off in July 2024 over concerns it would not clear antitrust hurdles.

Wiz had said in an internal memo at the time that it would focus on an initial public offering. Neither company has publicly acknowledged a deal. They did not immediately reply on Monday to Reuters requests for comment.

The deal hasn’t been signed and could still change, the person familiar with the development said. The Wall Street Journal on Monday first reported the news of the talks between the companies, citing sources.

If the Wiz acquisition goes ahead, it would help Alphabet tap the cybersecurity market and expand its booming cloud infrastructure business, which generated more than $43 billion in revenue last year.

While U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration is widely expected to drop some antitrust policies pursued under the administration of President Joe Biden, a deal that creates a cybersecurity behemoth is still likely to draw scrutiny.

Wall Street had expected a bump in dealmaking after Trump’s election, but the tariffs he has imposed or threatened have roiled global markets and left businesses and investors uncertain about big decisions.

Wiz provides cloud-based cybersecurity solutions powered by artificial intelligence that help companies identify and remove critical risks on cloud platforms.

It works with multiple cloud providers such as Microsoft and Amazon and counts companies from Morgan Stanley to DocuSign among its customers. With 900 employees across the United States, Europe, Asia and Israel, Wiz previously said it planned to add 400 workers globally in 2024.

Interest in the cybersecurity industry has surged since the global CrowdStrike outage last year, making enterprises more concerned about protecting their digital infrastructures.

Wiz was last valued at $12 billion in a private funding round in May 2024.

Looming US recession fears rock markets

The erratic strategies adopted by US President Donald Trump are astonishing and irritating Washington’s allies, causing fear among American consumers, denting investor confidence, fomenting uncertainty and hurting the established world financial architecture.

The US administration under Trump has ratcheted up tariffs and brought about turmoil in stock markets, leading to corporate bankruptcies.

US consumers may soon grumble about prices of household goods as the domestic economy may fall prey to the looming inflation and recession fears. Separately, astute business leaders are clamouring against the unpredictable policies of Trump while officials and staff at public and private organisations face increased uncertainty and the risk of losing jobs.

According to The Economist, the S&P 500 index fell by another 4% in the week to March 12, leaving the world’s most watched stock market down by 9% since its recent peak. The Nasdaq index, dominated by tech firms, has fallen by 12%. It is not quite the bold new era of American growth promised by Trump in his election campaign. The president’s unpredictable trade policies have got things going.

On March 12, in the latest twist in Trump’s trade saga, he levied 25% tariffs on imports of aluminium and steel. After years of growth, the health of the US economy is a source of concern, too, with worries triggered by a steady drip of discouraging data.

Statistics showed that consumer prices rose more slowly in February than analysts had expected. But the relief for shoppers also hints that America’s economy is shifting into a lower gear. Such news is beginning to undermine the idea of American exceptionalism; after all, investors have seen much better returns in China and Europe this year.

CNN reported that US corporate bankruptcies totaled 129 through the first two months of 2025, the highest total for this period in a year since 2010 in the aftermath of the Great Recession, according to the S&P Global Market Intelligence.

Just 20 days ago, the US stock market was sitting at all-time highs. The American economy appeared to be growing at a solid pace. And a recession was nowhere in sight. Now, the R-word is seemingly everywhere. Recession fears are rocking the stock market. GDP forecasts are getting slashed. Trump and his economic team are facing questions about a possible recession – and failing to address mounting jitters about the economy.

When it comes to Trump’s tariffs on Canada, Canadian premier Mark Carney warned that a predatory America wants “our water, our land, our country”.

Eminent regional expert and Centre for South Asia and International Studies Islamabad Executive Director Dr Mehmoodul Hassan Khan said it seems that “Trumpcession” is gaining momentum further, consolidating speculations of an imminent recession in the US that are rattling its stock markets and the economy alike.

On top of that, Trump’s brinkmanship and stop-start approach while imposing tariffs on Mexico, Canada and China have continued to hit common consumers and markets (crude oil and gold), pushing them into turmoil.

Surprisingly, right from the beginning, Trump was putting his political whims and wishes ahead of the strength of the economy and the stock market, raising the spectre of a US recession, which had increased from 15% to 20%.

Moreover, political inclusiveness, policy confusion and mixed messaging are creating a huge budget deficit. It should be a wake-up call to the US government because the first five months of fiscal year 2025 hit a record deficit of $1.147 trillion, including $307 billion in February 2025, highlighting the threat of a government shutdown.

Trump’s promise of ushering in a new era of prosperity for the Americans is still a far cry. Economic follies have increased economic pains. If the US government remains committed to its inconsistent economic and trade policies, even in the face of much worse data, recession risk would rise further.

Businessmen and investors are worried about big cuts to the government workforce and spending. A drastic decrease in retail sales vividly reflects high inflation and low consumer confidence. Thus, a drop in the stock market could trigger a further clampdown on spending, especially among higher-income households.

Trump’s warning of a little disturbance before bringing back wealth to America is clearly demonstrating doomsday ahead of prosperity and stability, increasing chances of recession-cum-adjustments, corrections and preferences, although the risk of recession is real like wolves knocking at the door.

Statistical data of many international organisations clearly indicates the US policy tilting away from growth and snaking of its 500 biggest companies, flashing a serious risk of recession.

When it comes to discomfort being faced by Americans, Khan said, “Ironically, by attracting his voters Trump never said that there might be a recession on the road to his so-called new golden age. The Black Monday should not be dubbed as a momentary blip, but an economic blast moving away from the promised prosperity to deepening chaos and uncertainty.

“Setting off trade wars with US neighbours, indiscriminately firing thousands of government workers, pursuing a global exit policy [USAID, WHO, WTO, climate change agreement] and punishing the weaker nations are fracturing an 80-year bond of trust with allies directly hurting its economy, industries, segments of society and supply chains.”

Now, the US consumer confidence is softening, hiring is slowing and fears of a recession are growing – the last thing the economy needs is a president whipping up uncertainty.

The US economic contraction may be averted by constructive competition and cooperation with all trading partners including China instead of blindly following so-called instinct spirits achieving nothing, but massive volatility.

This must be your date of birth to receive the $2,000 Social Security payment this Wednesday

Some of the 50 million-plus retirees relying on Social Security benefits are about to see their next check hit their bank accounts on Wednesday, March 19. The Social Security Administration (SSA) will also be sending out payments to those receiving disability benefits and survivor benefits—so plenty of folks are watching their mailboxes and bank balances closely.

When are Social Security checks going out in March 2025?

Each month, Social Security follows a three-Wednesday payment schedule, meaning that most of the 73 million recipients get their money based on their birth date rather than all at once.

For March, this staggered system rolled out like this:

  • March 12: Payments went to beneficiaries born between the 1st and 10th of the month.
  • March 19: Up next are those born between the 11th and 20th—their deposits will arrive on this day.
  • March 26: The final group—those with birthdays from the 21st to the 31st—will receive their payments.

If your birthday falls in the middle of the month, you’re next in line for a March 19 deposit—because Social Security likes to celebrate birthdays with direct deposits, not balloons.

Who doesn’t follow the Three-Wednesday payment schedule?

Not everyone gets their Social Security check based on their birthday. In fact, there are a few exceptions to the three-Wednesday rule:

If you started receiving retirement, disability, or survivor benefits before May 1997, this schedule doesn’t apply to you. Instead, your payments land on the third of each month, no matter when your birthday is. The only exception? If the third falls on a weekend or holiday, in which case the payment is sent earlier. For March 2025, this group received their checks on Monday, March 3.

Supplemental Security Income (SSI) recipients follow an entirely different schedule. SSI is a separate program from Social Security; it provides benefits to those with limited income and resources, regardless of their work history. These payments always arrive on the first of the month, unless that date happens to be a weekend or holiday. Since March 1 fell on a Saturday this year, SSI beneficiaries got their money a day early on Friday, February 28.

Some Americans qualify for both Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and regular Social Security benefits, which means they get two separate payments each month. If you’re in this group, your SSI check should have landed on February 28, while your regular Social Security payment arrived on March 3.

So, while most people have to wait for their assigned Wednesday, a lucky few still get their money on a fixed date, no birthday required!

Want to plan ahead? The Social Security Administration (SSA) has a full 2025 payment schedule available online. You can check it out on their official website to make sure you know exactly when to expect your next deposit.

How much do retired workers get from Social Security?

For the 52 million retirees in the U.S. relying on Social Security, the average monthly check comes in at just under $2,000. To be precise, the current average retirement payment is $1,978, according to the latest figures from the Social Security Administration (SSA).

Of course, not everyone gets the same amount. In 2025, the maximum possible monthly benefit for a retired worker is $5,108—but hitting that number means years of high earnings and waiting until full retirement age to cash in. For most folks, their Social Security check won’t make them rich, but it’s a crucial piece of their retirement puzzle.

Not everyone receiving Social Security benefits is a retiree. In fact, millions of Americans rely on disability, survivor benefits, or Supplemental Security Income (SSI) to make ends meet. Here’s how those payments stack up, according to the Social Security Administration (SSA):

  • Disabled workers bring in an average of $1,580 per month.
  • Survivor benefits provide around $1,546 monthly to those who qualify.
  • SSI recipients, who typically have limited income and resources, receive an average of $714 each month.

While these numbers aren’t exactly enough to live large, they serve as a vital financial safety net for millions across the country.

As Social Security faces an uncertain future, the debate on privatization heats up again

President Donald Trump’s efforts to slash federal government spending have ignited a new debate about the future of Social Security.

One idea that has been brought up before — privatizing the now public program — is getting new attention.

BlackRock CEO Larry Fink said Wednesday he supports more individual ownership in Social Security, though he said he would not necessarily use the term privatizing because it has toxic connotations.

“The problem we have now, we have a plan called Social Security that doesn’t grow with the economy,” said Fink, speaking at the BlackRock retirement summit in Washington, D.C.

Social Security is a pay-as-you-go system — today’s payroll tax contributions generally fund benefits for current retirees and other beneficiaries.

Any leftover money that is not used to either pay benefits or fund the program’s administrative costs is put into the program’s trust funds, according to the Social Security Administration. That money is invested in special Treasury bonds that earn a market rate of interest and are guaranteed by the U.S. government, according to the agency.

Privatizing the program could provide a way to invest money on behalf of individual workers that potentially earns a higher return, according to supporters of the idea.

“If we create a plan that every American can grow with our economy, they’re going to feel more attached to our economy,” Fink said.

‘Real battle’ brewing over Social Security’s future

Opponents say privatization could interfere with the safety and predictability of Social Security’s benefit payments.

“There’s a lot of people out there in the private sector that say, ‘You give me $2.7 trillion and let me invest that, and I can turn you a lot better, greater dividend around than the Treasury bills can,’” Rep. John Larson, D-Conn., said in an interview with CNBC on Tuesday.

While investing more aggressively provides the possibility for better returns, it also opens up the risk of poor performance and losses.

Larson pointed out that in 2008 the stock market dropped, along with many people’s 401(k) plans. Yet Social Security never missed a payment, he said.

Americans now face a decision as to whether they want capitalism or the government to guarantee their retirement, Larson said.

Larson said he believes the Trump administration’s goal is to privatize Social Security.

When asked for comment, the White House referred CNBC to a release dated Tuesday that says, “President Trump will always protect Social Security, Medicare.” That document does not mention privatizing the program.

Lawmakers on the House Ways and Means Committee on Wednesday voted to block a full House vote on a resolution of inquiry that Larson proposed to require disclosure of activity by the so-called Department of Government Efficiency at the Social Security Administration. At the hearing, Larson said he is concerned the Trump administration could try to privatize the program.

“We, I think, are in a real battle here, and it’s really, in many respects, not unlike the battle that Roosevelt faced initially,” Larson told CNBC on Tuesday.

Privatizing Social Security has been considered before

The Social Security Act that created the program was signed into law by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1935.

In 2005 President George W. Bush proposed privatizing the program.

Fink said that had that effort been successful, Americans would have seen their retirement money increase fourfold, based on the returns of the S&P 500 index over that time.

“I think more Americans would be a little more hopeful today with their retirement savings than just getting that bond payment,” Fink said.

Had Bush’s proposals gone through, Americans “probably would have been” better off today, said Andrew Biggs, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute who served as associate director of Bush’s White House National Economic Council in 2005.

But the question now as to whether to invest Americans’ retirement money in government bonds or equities is misguided, Biggs said.

If someone has not saved money for retirement, the dilemma of where to invest is not relevant since they do not have the funds, he said. The same is true of the federal government, which currently does not have a significant surplus for the pay-as-you-go program.

Moreover, if Social Security transitions to personalized accounts, there would also need to be extra money available to fund the transition costs to keep benefits going to current retirees, he said.

“It’s a question of saving more,” Biggs said.

Generally, Social Security reform discussions focus on making changes to improve the current system — raising taxes, cutting benefits or a combination of both.

Larson has a proposal to improve Social Security’s solvency by raising taxes on the wealthy while implementing benefit increases.

Yet whether Republicans, who generally oppose tax increases, and Democrats, who do not want benefit cuts, can reach a bipartisan compromise is an open question.

Starting reform discussions based on the program’s current structure is limiting, Biggs said.

“We really do have a failure of imagination on Social Security reform,” Biggs said. “I think what Larry Fink is saying is, ‘Let’s think big on it.’ I think he’s absolutely correct on that point.”

Inheritance warning over looming $3.5 trillion wealth transfer: ‘Disaster waiting to happen’

An Australian lawyer has sounded the alarm over the $3.5 trillion wealth transfer that Baby Boomers are about to pass on to younger generations. Will disputes are already rising due to growing wealth and Aussies are being warned they could “squander away tens of thousands” trying to get their inheritance if their loved ones don’t have their affairs in order.

Baby Boomers, who are Australia’s richest generation, are expected to transfer $3.5 trillion to younger generations over the coming decades. The huge scale of wealth means the stakes are higher for many Aussies when it comes to their inheritance.

Justice Family Lawyers principal Hayder Shkara told Yahoo Finance he expected disputes over wills would continue to rise as Baby Boomers begin the “great wealth transfer”.

“This is the biggest intergenerational wealth shift in history, and with that comes heightened tensions, particularly in families where expectations don’t align with reality,” Shkara said.

“One of the key drivers of these disputes is the rising value of real estate. A house that was purchased decades ago for a modest sum could now be worth millions, and that changes how family members perceive their entitlements.”

In Sydney, for example, the average property value has skyrocketed to $1.18 million.

“We also see a rise in blended families, estranged relationships, and informal caregiving arrangements, all of which can complicate inheritance matters,” Shkara said.

Inheritances have already more than doubled, with the Productivity Commission finding they had increased from $24 billion in 2022 to $52 billion in 2018.

Aussies over 60 are expected to transfer an average of $175 billion per year in wealth over the next two decades.

More adults challenging wills

There has already been a significant increase in family provision claims, which is when someone feels they’ve been unfairly left out of a will or didn’t get enough.

Shkara said he commonly saw children who cared for their elderly parents challenge wills when they found their parents had distributed assets equally among all siblings.

“The law recognises that while you can leave your estate to whoever you like, you also have a duty to provide for certain people—like your spouse or kids,” he told Yahoo Finance.

“We recently assisted in a dispute where a father left his estate equally to his two children, but one had moved interstate and had little contact with him, while the other had cared for him daily in his final years.

“The child who provided care felt strongly that they should receive a larger share. There isn’t a straightforward answer to this, so it resulted in a contested estate where the lawyers start arguing over what is right in these circumstances.

“Because the father didn’t document his wishes, the dispute escalated, costing the estate time and money in legal proceedings.”

‘Disaster’: Aussies don’t have up-to-date wills

Australian Seniors research found that a third of Aussies over 50 haven’t got a will and for those who do, nearly half haven’t updated it in more than five years.

“That’s a disaster waiting to happen,” Shkara said.

“If you die without [a will], the law decides who gets what based on a legal formula—not on what you would’ve actually wanted.

“It increases the chances of your estate being disputed, and results in a confused family with less assets than you hoped for.”

Shkara has urged Aussies to get their affairs in order early on.

“The better planned you are, the less likely you will have a dispute,” he said.

“A well-structured will, open discussions with family members, and a statement of wishes can prevent many of these disputes before they arise.

“I’ve seen siblings squander away tens of thousands of dollars because of wills that were not properly drafted.”

Skhara said a will wasn’t just about money though. It can also make life easier for your family down the track.

“Sorting it now avoids a world of stress later,” he said.

Man says Social Security benefits terminated without warning or explanation

OKLAHOMA CITY (KFOR) — An Oklahoma City retiree says his Social Security benefits were suspended without warning — and with no explanation given when he reached out. He worries it may have to do with the place he was born, and ongoing Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) cutbacks.

The man, James McCaffrey, who was born to an active-duty U.S. soldier at an overseas Army base, says because of recent comments from DOGE leader Elon Musk, he’s worried his benefits were cut because of his foreign birthplace.

Earlier this month, Musk, the billionaire head of DOGE, pushed for major cuts to Social Security, calling it a “Ponzi scheme,” claiming the system is rife with people fraudulently receiving benefits.

Particularly, Musk claimed during an interview with Fox Business, with no evidence, that many illegal immigrants are receiving benefits, calling for them to be removed from Social Security’s rolls.

The Hill reported economists say the levels of fraud Musk has talked about “just don’t exist.”

Earlier this month, NBC News reported former Social Security administrator Martin O’Malley warned that DOGE’s cuts to Social Security could disrupt benefits for millions of Americans for the first time since Social Security’s founding.

Now, McCaffrey worries he may have been one of the first of them.

An unexpected bill and unanswered questions

McCaffrey said he started to think something was often when he received an unexpected Medicare bill.

“It said that I needed to pay $740 before the 25th of this month or I was going to lose my Medicare,” McCaffrey said.

That seemed odd, since his Medicare payment is normally deducted from his Social Security check.

“So I called Medicare,” he said. “They returned my call after a wait and told me that they were unable to process it through my Social Security payment, that there was some problem with it. We talked for a bit. He kind of let it out that he thinks it’s a possibility that my Social Security was suspended.”

And that — definitely didn’t make sense to McCaffrey.

“I thanked him for his time and called Social Security,” he said.

After more than two and a half hours on hold with Social Security, he finally got a callback.

“They confirmed that my account was suspended,” McCaffrey said.

He says Social Security never sent him any sort of notice this was happening, so he can’t be certain the exact day his benefits were canceled.

But he knows it must have been sometime between the day he received his February Social Security check early in the month, and Feb. 27, the date written on the bill he received from Medicare.

He asked the Social Security agent if there was anything she could do to fix it.

“She said she was going to input some stuff and that she hoped that would take care of it,” he said.

And by the next morning, sure enough, the issue had been fixed.

“I just got a simple email on my phone,” McCaffrey said. “It said that my normal payment was going to resume in April.”

The email didn’t mention anything about the March payment he never received.

He took it upon himself to check his bank account, where he saw his March check had since been deposited.

“Well, that’s fine and dandy,” McAffrey said. “I enjoyed that, but they gave me no explanation.”

For him to get an explanation, he had to become his own detective of sorts.

He thought back to an experience he had two years ago when he first went to a Social Security office to apply for benefits.

“The first person I talked to at the Social Security Administration told me that I was not an American citizen,” McCaffrey said.

McCaffrey was born on a U.S. Army base in Germany, where his father was stationed for active duty.

He has an American birth certificate — officially stamped and sealed by the federal government.

“I was on American soil,” he said. “I’m American. She told me I was going to need to hire a lawyer, get a naturalization before I could even apply for Social Security.”

But when he returned another day with his birth certificate and passport, a different employee told him there was no issue.

“Got a different person, presented my things to him, and he says, ‘I don’t need these. You’re fine. I don’t know what. She’s just misinformed.’ And I’ve never had a problem with anything until [Tuesday],” McCaffrey said.

Then he remembered something he had recently seen on TV.

Elon Musk, the billionaire in charge of DOGE, spoke about Social Security during an interview on Fox Business Network.

In the interview, Musk suggested, without citing evidence, that non-citizens in large numbers are receiving Social Security benefits, and called for them to be purged from the system.

“[Federal entitlements] is also a mechanism by which Democrats attract and retain illegal immigrants, by essentially paying them,” Musk said during the March 10 interview on Fox Business. “If we turn off this gigantic money magnet for illegal immigrants, then they will leave.”

That made McAffrey wonder about his own situation.

“I think they went into Social Security and suspended all foreign addresses, whether you reside at home, born on them,” he said.

KFOR reached out to the Social Security Administration for an explanation, but officials declined to comment, citing confidentiality rules, but the news station put them in touch with McCaffrey.

He says a representative with the Social Security Administration called him on Wednesday, but still offered no explanation for why his benefits were terminated.

“It makes me wonder how many other people are going to get — or have gotten — that same Medicare letter,” McCaffrey said.

He worries about people who may not have the time and resources he had to get to the bottom of what happened and get his benefits back.

“I’ve been a diligent Boy Scout type, I prepared,” he said. “But, no, I shouldn’t have to.”

McAffrey, 66, says there was one thing he most looked forward about retirement.

“More time with the grandkids,” McAffrey told Nexstar’s KFOR.

He said he made sure to save up enough retirement money to—quite frankly—spoil his three grandkids.

“I went out and bought [my granddaughter] a new jacket,” McCaffrey said. “She’s thrilled. And then her sister says, ‘well, you know, she got a new jacket. Where’s mine?’ I said, ‘I’ll get you one.’”

He also looked forward to being able to travel more with his wife, who is nearing retirement herself.

But he thought all those dreams would have to come to a halt, after he opened his mail on Tuesday.

“I’d hate to have to turn around and say, ‘Well, I have to worry about my next check,’” he said.

He also worries about people who may not share the same savings or the same financial cushion that he had to fall back on. “And you interrupt that for seven days, two weeks or even longer, and they’re in bad trouble,” he said. “They could be out of the house. They could be out of food. I don’t know.”

Larry Fink says retirement is a benefit increasingly limited to Fortune 500 employees, and widening the scope should be a ‘national priority’

BlackRock CEO Larry Fink warned of a growing retirement crisis, emphasizing that only employees at top companies benefit from adequate retirement planning while many Americans feel unprepared. He urges corporate leaders and politicians to rethink the system, acknowledging younger generations’ economic anxiety and suggesting older generations should work longer to restore trust and financial security.

While short-term economic uncertainty is fairly high on the list of priorities for CEOs at the moment, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink also wants to keep the topic of retirement front and centre.

The investment management chief has often shared his thoughts on a coming retirement crisis, saying not enough is being done to generate wealth for younger generations when they hit retirement age.

This week Fink, who is worth $1.2 billion per Forbes, warned that it’s also only those who work for the biggest companies in the world who are truly benefitting from retirement planning.

“One of the fundamental problems in America is, retirement’s not that bad of a problem for the top Fortune 500 companies. We are providing enough support to our employees where they’re getting the adequacy of retirement,” Fink told CNN earlier this week.

“It’s beyond that, we refuse to talk about how do we get more broadening of our economy with more Americans participating in that. That’s why we have to have a conversation in Washington, this has to be considered a national priority and a national promise to all Americans.”

When countered that it’s easy for a billionaire to lecture the public on saving, Fink reportedly responded: “There was a time when I wasn’t one.”

Fink—whose organization handles $10 trillion in assets earmarked for retirement—is correct in his stance that many Americans don’t feel sufficiently prepared for the day they stop working.

A Fed report released last year found that, on average, only 34% of the public felt their savings were on track. This was up from a year prior as in 2022, when just 31% of Americans said their savings schedule was going to plan, but still down on the 40% reported in 2021 when COVID-related savings were at their peak.

The younger the respondents to the Fed survey were, the less confident they were in their ability to put aside adequate amounts of cash to stop working. The report—which surveyed more than 16,000 people—found those aged between 18 and 29 were the least confident with only 26% of respondents saying their savings were on track.

This rose to 34% for those aged between 30 and 44, and to 38% between the ages of 45 to 59. By the age category of 60+ this confidence rose to 45%—signaling the majority of the respondents as they closed in on retirement still didn’t feel confident about their finances.

It’s perhaps no surprise then that the Fed survey also found that 27% of adults in 2023 considered themselves to be retired, but were still working in some capacity. Of that, 4% were still in full-time work.

Generational tension

The lack of security younger generations are feeling when they think about their financial future is a dynamic Fink, aged 72, is keenly aware of.

In fact last year he called on his own generation to do more to support their younger peers, writing in a letter to BlackRock investors that corporate leaders and politicians to pursue “an organized, high-level effort” to rethink the retirement system.

“It’s no wonder younger generations, Millennials and Gen Z, are so economically anxious,” Fink wrote. “They believe my generation—the baby boomers—have focused on their own financial well-being to the detriment of who comes next. And in the case of retirement, they’re right.”

Fink questioned, for example, whether the retirement age should still be set at 65 and if his generation and those immediately below it should work for longer.

He said the burden to reestablish trust with younger people—who fear their social security benefits will be run dry by the time they reach retirement age—sits with older generations.

“Maybe investing for their long-term goals, including retirement, isn’t such a bad place to begin,” Fink added.

error: Content is protected !!