Dow drops 300 points to start week as investors look for progress on Trump trade deals: Live updates

Stock markets around the world have been relatively settled this week after a period of chaos, sparked by US trade tariffs.
But investors are still closely watching a part of the market which rarely moves dramatically – the US bond market.
Governments sell bonds – essentially an IOU – to raise money for public spending and in return they pay interest.
Recently, in an extremely rare move the rate the US government had to pay on its bonds rose sharply, while the price of bonds themselves fell.
The volatility suggests investors were losing confidence in the world’s biggest economy.
You may think it’s too esoteric to bother you, but here’s why it matters and how it may change President Trump’s mind on tariffs.
When a government wants to borrow money, it usually does so by selling bonds – known as “Treasuries” in the US – to investors on financial markets.
Such payments are made over a number of pre-agreed years before a full and final payment is made when the bond “matures” – in other words, expires.
Investors who buy bonds are mainly made up of financial institutions, ranging from pension funds to central banks like the Bank of England.
Investors buy government bonds because they are seen as a safe place to invest their money. There is little risk a government will not repay the money, especially an economic superpower like the US.
So when the economy is turbulent and investors want to take money out of volatile stocks and shares markets, they usually place that cash in US bonds.
But recently that hasn’t happened.
Initially, following the so-called “Liberation Day” tariffs announcement on 2 April when shares fell, investors did appear to flock to US bonds.
However, when the first of these tariffs kicked in on 5 April and Trump doubled down on his policies that weekend, investors began dumping government bonds, sending the interest rate the US government would have to pay to borrow money up sharply.
The so-called yield for US government borrowing over 10 years shot up from 3.9% to 4.5%, while the 30-year yield spiked at almost 5%. Movements of 0.2% in either direction are considered a big deal.
Why the dramatic sell-off? In short, the uncertainty over the impact of tariffs on the US economy led to investors no longer seeing government bonds as such a safe bet, so demanded bigger returns to buy them.
The higher the perceived risk, the higher the yield investors want to compensate for taking it.
If the US government is spending more on debt interest repayments, it can affect budgets and public spending as it becomes more costly for the government to sustain itself.
But it can also have a direct impact on households and even more so on businesses.
John Canavan, lead analyst at Oxford Economics, says when investors charge higher rates to lend the government money, other rates for lending that have more risk attached, such as mortgages, credit cards and car loans, also tend to rise.
Businesses, especially small ones, are likely to be hardest hit by any immediate change in borrowing rates, as most homeowners in the US have fixed-rate deals of between 15 and 30 years. If businesses can’t get access to credit, that can halt economic growth and lead to job losses over time.
Mr Canavan adds that banks can become more cautious in lending money, which could impact the US economy.
First-time buyers and those wishing to move home could also face higher costs, he says, which could impact the housing market in the longer term. It’s common in the US for small business owners starting out to use the equity in their home as collateral.
Following the introduction of tariffs, Trump urged his nation to “hang tough”, but it appears the potential threat to jobs and the US economy stopped the president in his tracks.
Following the ructions in the bond markets, he introduced a 90-day pause for the higher tariffs on every country except China. The 10% blanket tariff, however, on all countries remains.
It proved a pressure point for Trump – and now the world knows it.
“Although President Donald Trump was able to resist the stock market sell-off, once the bond market began to weaken too, it was only a matter of time before he folded,” says Paul Ashworth, chief North America economist at Capital Economics.
According to US media reports, it was Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, inundated with calls from business leaders, who played a key part in swaying Trump.
The bond market reaction has led to comparisons with former UK Prime Minister Liz Truss’s infamous mini-Budget of September 2022. The unfunded tax cuts announced then spooked investors, who dumped UK government bonds, resulting in the Bank of England stepping in to buy bonds to save pension funds from collapse.
Some analysts suggested that America’s central bank, the US Federal Reserve, might have been forced to step in if the sell-off had worsened.
While bond yields have settled, some might argue the damage has already been done as they remain higher than before the blanket tariffs kicked in.
“Arguably the most worrying aspect of the [recent] turmoil… is an emerging risk premium in US Treasury bonds and the dollar, akin to what the UK experienced in 2022,” according to Jonas Goltermann, deputy chief markets economist at Capital Economics.
But unless you’re a first-time buyer or selling your home, Americans are unlikely to be immediately hit by higher mortgage costs, unlike Brits who were securing new shorter-term fixed deals.
Since 2010, foreign ownership of US bonds has almost doubled, rising by $3 trillion, according to Deutsche Bank.
Japan holds the most US Treasuries, but China, the US’s arch enemy in this global trade war, is the second biggest holder of US government debt globally.
Questions were raised about whether it sparked the debt sell-off in response to being hit with huge tariffs.
However, this is unlikely as any fire sale “would impoverish China more than it would hurt the US”, according to Capital Economics.
When a reporter asked President Donald Trump why he paused country-by-country tariffs only a week after unveiling them, Trump said “Well, I thought that people were jumping a little bit out of line. They were getting yippy, you know? They were getting a little bit yippy, a little bit afraid.”
Trump’s April 9 explanation came a day after the S&P 500, a broad stock market gauge, fell to 19 percent below its most recent peak, which had come in mid-February.
Americans with investments, retirement savings or pensions reliant on the stock market were feeling the squeeze of that decline. But economists and other financial observers suspected that the stock market decline may not have been the most important factor pushing Trump to pause these tariffs.
The likelier culprit: the bond market.
In February 1993, Democratic political strategist James Carville offered The Wall Street Journal a timeless characterization of the bond market’s influence:
“I used to think if there was reincarnation, I wanted to come back as the president or the pope or a .400 baseball hitter,” Carville, an adviser to then-President Bill Clinton, said. “But now I want to come back as the bond market. You can intimidate everybody.”
Economists agree that the bond market profoundly shapes the U.S. and global economies. Here are some questions and answers about how it works, and why Americans should care.
“The bond market” refers to the market for U.S. government bonds, which range in maturity from one-month Treasury bills to 30-year Treasury bonds. A bond “allows one party to borrow from another and then repay the loan on pre-specified terms,” said Anastassia Fedyk, an assistant professor of finance at the University of California-Berkeley’s Haas School of Business.
Anyone can purchase bonds. If you hold a bond to its maturity, its interest rate remains at the rate that was established when it was issued; this is considered a relatively safe and stable strategy, because you know going in what you will get in the end.
But you can also sell bonds before they mature, to take advantage of other investors’ financial needs at a given moment. Depending on market conditions, you could end up selling a bond for less than it’s denominated for — that is, less than its face value in dollars plus its interest rate — or you could end up selling it for more than that.
The market for bonds depends on two key metrics. One is the price, which is what someone will pay to buy a bond that hasn’t yet matured. The other is the yield, which is the bond’s return on your investment.
As the price you pay for a bond goes up, its yield will go down. Mathematically, this makes sense: You are paying more for the bond, so what you make off the bond will go down. Alternatively, if you are paying less for a bond, the yield will go up.
“A basic law of finance is if you don’t want to buy a bond, the seller has to lower its price to make it attractive to you,” said Moshe Lander, a senior lecturer in economics at Concordia University. “And when that happens, the yield goes up. You have to entice someone with a better return.”
When bond yields rise, the cost of every other type of borrowing — credit cards, mortgages, business loans, financing the federal debt — increases.
That’s because historically, U.S. Treasury bonds have been considered the marketplace’s safest investments. For decades, the U.S. government has been big, stable and reliable. In a worst-case scenario, it’s a sovereign entity that can print money to pay off its debts (though not without negative economic consequences, notably inflation).
Compared with the federal government, every other bond issuer or lender — states, cities, corporations, banks and other financial institutions — is a little, or a lot, riskier. So their interest rates are always higher than the federal government’s. And if the federal government’s interest rates rise, the interest rates for these other institutions will rise, too.
“When it becomes more costly for the government to borrow, it also gets more costly for firms and households to borrow,” said Joseph Steinberg, a University of Toronto associate professor of economics.
This is a problem for the broader economy. Higher borrowing costs make it harder for companies to invest and expand, and make it harder for consumers to pay for the things those companies produce, from groceries to appliances to new homes. This can become a vicious cycle.
Higher interest rates also add to the federal government’s debt load. In this scenario, newly issued federal bonds, which are used to finance the federal government’s debt, will need to have a higher interest rate. This means the government will have to pay more for every dollar it borrows going forward, and these higher interest payments risk crowding out other priorities the government wants to spend money on, from Social Security benefits to military salaries.
After Trump’s tariff announcement on April 2 — a plan that many investors saw as more far-reaching than they’d expected — a lot of investors chose to sell off U.S. government bonds.
These investors sold their bonds because they saw increased “risk and uncertainty” for the U.S. economy in a higher-tariffed future, Fedyk said. “This pushed bond prices lower, and yields higher,” she said. “The change was pretty dramatic, with 10-year yields going from under 4 percent all the way to 4.5 percent on April 8.”
Investors’ declining confidence in the U.S. economy portended a future in which both U.S. government bonds and other types of lending would see higher interest rates, which would have a negative impact on the economy.
But the hurt didn’t stop there, finance experts say. “What’s going on now suggests that the U.S. government has lost its appeal as a source of safe assets,” Steinberg said.
Steinberg said an economic downturn “is usually associated with a drop in bond yields,” not an increase. That’s because in times of uncertainty, parking money in the U.S. — and in U.S. bonds in particular — is seen as safer than the alternatives. This drives up demand for U.S. bonds, meaning higher prices — and lower yields.
The opposite was happening after Trump announced his tariffs.
If the U.S. had been looking like a strong economy in the months and years ahead, “yields should be coming down,” Lander said. “If they’re going up, that suggests that inflation and risk are rising.”
Trump’s moves “spooked the market,” Lander said.
In the April 9 announcement, Trump paused the specific tariffs his administration had calculated for virtually every country, though he kept in place a standard 10 percent tariff on every foreign product; he also kept existing tariffs on Canada and Mexico in place and raised tariffs on China.
Despite his announcement, “it doesn’t appear that the 90-day pause has done much to reassure investors,” Steinberg said.
The yield for five-year Treasury notes fell between mid-February and Trump’s April 2 announcement — a favorable development for the U.S. Then, from April 2 to April 9 — the day he announced the 90-day pause — the yield for the five-year note rose. Its yield peaked on April 11, then proceeded to fall through April 14, but only to a level that was still well above its pre-April 2 level.
“There is still a lot of uncertainty remaining, including what will happen at the end of the 90 days and how the trade war with China will evolve,” Fedyk said.
A heavy slate of U.S. company results in the coming week will test a stock market shaken by a U.S. trade policy overhaul that upended the outlook for the global economy and corporate America.
Investors remain on edge after President Donald Trump’s sweeping April 2 tariff announcement stunned markets and sparked some of the most volatile trading since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic five years ago.
After rebounding somewhat last week, the benchmark S&P 500 (.SPX), opens new tab stock index fell this week and was down 14% from its February record high. Volatility levels moderated from five-year peaks but remain elevated by historic measures.
Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab and Google parent Alphabet (GOOGL.O), opens new tab – two of the so-called Magnificent Seven megacap companies whose shares have faltered after two years of stock leadership – are among those closely watched for financial results as investors seek guidance about the fallout from tariffs that are very much in flux.
“The view of the CEOs going forward has never been more important,” said JJ Kinahan, CEO of IG North America and president of online broker Tastytrade.
It may seem like a bad time to invest in the stock market due to the uncertainty ahead, but it may actually be a no-brainer to do so right now. While the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) is down roughly 10% in 2025 as of Thursday’s prices, historically, it has risen in value.
The index is designed to track 500 of the best publicly traded stocks on the market. And by investing in exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that track the broad index, long-term investors have an easy way to benefit from the market’s growth over the years.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue »
Here’s how you can easily invest in an S&P 500 ETF, and why you should consider doing so today.
There are many ETFs available that can help you track the S&P 500. One of the most popular options is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (NYSEMKT: SPY). It has a low expense ratio of 0.09%, and its total returns (which include dividends) over the past 10 years have been nearly identical to those of the index.
^SPX data by YCharts
As you can see, investing in the ETF over the long haul has allowed investors to generate some great returns, while enjoying a lot of diversification and taking on minimal risk. A $10,000 investment in the fund over this time frame would have grown to some $30,000 — and that’s even when you factor in the market’s decline this year.
But often, when prices rise too quickly, market forces can bring them down back to reality.
The S&P 500 has historically averaged annual returns of around 10%. That’s just an average, however, and there will be both good and bad years mixed in along the way. For example, in 2024 and 2023, the index rose by more than 20% — well above its long-run average. And that propelled it to a higher-than-typical valuation.
The cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings ratio, also known as CAPE, looks at a 10-year period to help gauge how cheap or expensive the stock market is. And prior to the market sell-off this year, the CAPE ratio was up around 37. The last time it was that high was back in 2021, just before the following year’s crash in the markets, when the S&P 500 would decline by more than 19%.
The CAPE ratio is down to 33 now. And while that’s still high, it suggests that stocks are not as egregiously overvalued as they were at the beginning of the year. That doesn’t guarantee that more of a decline won’t be coming this year, but investing in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF when valuations are more modest can help investors secure better returns over the long run.
The market was arguably overdue for a decline heading into this year, given its impressive performance heading into 2025, and buying at elevated levels may have been risky due to the potential for a correction.
While you don’t necessarily want to time the markets, it’s generally a good idea to invest in the S&P 500 at a time of weakness, simply because it can lead to far better returns in the long haul than if you bought when its valuation was at record levels. Even though stocks may still fall this year, investing in the S&P 500 right now can be a great move for long-term investors.
President Donald Trump on Thursday again made clear his disdain for Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, going so far as to say the central banker’s “termination can’t come fast enough” and saying in an Oval Office event that Powell will “be out of there real fast” if he wants.
While many experts say the president does not in fact have the power to fire the Fed chief due to policy differences, Trump has made clear he’s willing to break with norms and precedent, even in the face of potentially monumental repercussions.
Regardless, the leading contender to lead the US central bank under Trump, whether at the end of Powell’s term in May 2026 or earlier, reportedly appears to be Kevin Warsh, a former Fed governor who previously was under consideration to be Trump’s Treasury secretary for the president’s second term and was a candidate for the top job at the Fed during Trump’s first term.
CNN previously reported that Warsh was again on Trump’s shortlist to become Fed chair this time around, once Powell’s time is up. In fact, Trump’s selection of Scott Bessent to lead the Treasury Department was seen by many as a way to leave Warsh open for an eventual appointment as Fed chair.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Bloomberg earlier this week that the administration will start interviewing candidates for Powell’s successor “sometime in the fall.” And with speculation swirling over whether Trump will try to oust Powell before his term ends, Bessent said that “monetary policy is a jewel box that’s got to be preserved.”
But who is the man who might soon lead one of the world’s most powerful financial institutions?
Warsh, 55, was a vice president and executive director at Morgan Stanley in the company’s mergers and acquisitions division before serving as a special assistant to then-President George Bush for economic policy and as executive secretary at the National Economic Council.
Like Powell, Warsh does not have a graduate degree in economics. He graduated from Harvard Law School in 1995.
Bush appointed Warsh to the Fed’s Board of Governors in 2006, where he served during the height of the Great Recession as chief liaison to Wall Street.
In that role, he helped coordinate the sale of Bear Sterns to JPMorgan Chase. But he also allowed Lehman Brothers to go under in 2008, a watershed moment for global financial markets. Warsh resigned from the Fed in 2011 after publicly voicing his opposition to the central bank’s plan to buy $600 billion worth of bonds to inject more money into the economy.
More recently, Warsh advised Trump’s transition team on economic policy after the November election. In a January opinion piece in The Wall Street Journal, he joined Trump in criticizing the Fed for letting inflation rise sharply during and after the pandemic.
Warsh currently serves as a distinguished economics fellow at the Hoover Institution, a conservative think tank; and is a visiting scholar at Stanford University’s Graduate School of Business.
Additionally, he is a member of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office’s panel of advisers. He is married to billionaire Jane Lauder, granddaughter of Estée Lauder, the late cosmetics industry mogul.
In his Wall Street Journal op-ed, Warsh wrote that high inflation rates over the past few years arose from “a government that spent too much and a central bank that printed too much.” However, most mainstream economists attribute inflation’s eruption in 2021 mostly to pandemic-induced shocks to demand and supply.
Warsh wrote that “the Fed should steer clear of political prognostications, not just in word but in deed,” pointing to minutes from a Fed meeting last year indicating officials believed Trump’s proposed policies could fuel inflation.
In an interview with Fox Business ahead of the Fed’s latest policy meeting last month, Warsh said the turmoil sparked by Trump’s tariff war indicates an economy that “is transitioning.”
“The president inherited a fiscal and economic and regulatory mess, and it’s going to take a little digging out to be on a stronger platform for growth,” he said. “Rome wasn’t built in a day, so this will take some time.”
When asked about the likelihood of Trump’s tariffs stoking inflation, Warsh said that “inflation is a choice, and the Fed has made a lot of bad choices over these last several years.”
“The president has to take matters into this own hands and try to kill inflation by reducing government spending,” he said.
What was a massive rally on Wall Street turned into yet another sizeable decline.
Cheap stocks and hope for signs of trade negotiation sent markets surging Tuesday morning — but that relief rally evaporated as the White House said it would levy enormous tariffs on China.
US stocks tumbled solidly into the red in the afternoon. The Dow fell 320 points, or 0.84%. The broader S&P 500 fell 1.57%. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite slid 2.15%.
The S&P 500 closed at its lowest level in almost a year. The Dow and Nasdaq both closed at their lowest level since January 2024.
Markets fell because President Donald Trump is set to impose an additional 84% in levies across all Chinese imports on Wednesday, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt announced Tuesday. That will mean all goods from the country are subject to a tariff of at least 104%.
The S&P 500 and Nasdaq, which had surged as much as 4% and 4.5%, respectively, Tuesday morning, tumbled midday as Leavitt spoke to reporters. The loss for the Dow comes after the blue-chip index surged as much as 3.85% on Tuesday morning.
At its lowest point of the day, the S&P 500 briefly dipped into bear market territory (down 20% from its record high in February) before pulling back and closing down 18.9% from that peak. It’s the second day in a row the S&P 500 has flirted with bear territory.
Meanwhile, the Nasdaq, firmly in a bear market since Friday, closed down 24.3% from its record high in December. The Dow closed down 16.4% from its record high in December.
“We’re not anywhere out of the woods yet, and so that sort of tempers things,” said Thomas Martin, senior portfolio manager at Globalt Investments.
Wall Street’s fear gauge, the VIX index, surged higher Tuesday after spiking to historic levels the past two sessions, reflecting jitters among traders. “Extreme fear” was the sentiment driving markets, according to CNN’s Fear and Greed index.
After markets plunged over the course of the past three trading sessions, Wall Street investors were looking for any excuse to catch their breath ahead of the planned tariff escalation at midnight — but Trump’s hefty tariffs on China were a reminder that reprieve can be fleeting.
Over the course of the past few days, stock prices got absolutely hammered as Wall Street grew fearful that Trump’s tariff policy would plunge the US and global economies into a recession. After three days of market carnage, investors appeared to be seeking some buying opportunities.
One measure of the price-to-earnings ratio of S&P 500 companies closed below 17 Monday — historically cheap, giving investors a chance to scoop up stocks they believe might be oversold.
“This is a very normal action and very technical in nature after a shock period,” said Truist’s Keith Lerner. “The market is extremely oversold, and markets don’t move in a linear fashion.”
Lerner noted that historic market rebounds tend to be clustered in with massive declines, as investors with FOMO worry they could miss out on a rally.
“In a period of uncertainty, each bit of new information is overextrapolated, which leads to wider-than-normal-swings,” Lerner added.
That explains why a bit of fake news Monday that Trump was considering a tariffs pause — immediately batted down by the White House — sent stocks temporarily surging. That gave markets a taste for what could happen if some nations begin to make progress in negotiating lower tariffs.
“Yesterday market players saw how the hint of ‘good news’ — in that case it was chatter about a pause in the Liberation Day tariffs — could rally markets by whole percentage points very quickly,” Michael Block of Third Seven Capital said in a note to investors. “Even though that proved to be all smoke, traders are now poised for the fire – that is, real news.”
Investors have been on edge for any updates from the White House that might signal Trump is negotiating his trade policy.
White House National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett said Tuesday on Fox News that the administration is managing “a massive number of requests for negotiations” from nations and that Trump is prioritizing “two of our closest allies and trading partners,” Japan and South Korea.
Earlier on Tuesday, Trump posted on social media that he had “a great call with the Acting President of South Korea.” On Monday, Trump spoke with Japan’s Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, who will be sending a team to visit Washington to negotiate a trade deal.
“(Traders) are peeking around every corner looking for even the slightest whiff of a trade deal or movement on the tariff front,” said Jamie Cox, managing director at Harris Financial group. “The market is wound up for a face-ripping rally.”
Across the Atlantic, The European Union’s executive arm said the bloc is prepared to negotiate with the United States over buying more of its liquefied natural gas. It’s a response to a grievance raised Trump, who has said the EU must buy around $350 billion worth of American LNG to compensate for the deficit the US has in goods trade with the bloc.
US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said Tuesday during a routine hearing before the Senate Finance Committee that the administration is in talks with about 50 countries and that they’re trying to address some non-tariff related measures, such as foreign countries’ regulations that impede US exports.
Greer reaffirmed that Trump’s massive reciprocal tariffs will go into effect Wednesday.
“We will have the president’s plan go into effect, and we’re coupling that with immediate negotiations with our partners,” he said.
Markets tried to rebound Tuesday before sliding. It’s a reminder that there’s no guarantee stocks will remain buoyant.
After imposing across-the-board 10% tariffs on virtually all products coming into the United States Saturday, the Trump administration is set to impose significantly steeper levies still on dozens of countries. Those tariffs, which Trump has called “reciprocal,” although they are no such thing, amount to as much as 50% for a handful of countries.
China’s Commerce Ministry on Tuesday said the country would “fight to the end” of the trade war and would continue to stand up to Trump.
The escalating trade war between the two largest economies is turning into a high-stakes game of chicken. China has squashed deals that Trump wants — including a US company taking control of ports on both sides of the Panama Canal and a deal to sell TikTok to a US-based company. Both countries’ economies would be hurt in a trade war — and given the massive trade imbalance with the United States, China could very well be hurt worse.
So investors hopeful for a deal may not get one. And if they don’t, a damaging trade war could bring down both economies — and markets along with them.
Any escalation of the trade war would probably lead to a US and global recession this year, multiple Wall Street banks have said over the course of the past week, including Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase. That could continue to sap demand for stocks.
Although the current bounce back may be short-lived, some in the Trump administration were already declaring victory.
“It’s finding the bottom now. It’s finding the bottom now,” Trump’s top trade adviser Peter Navarro said about the market Monday evening on Fox News. “It’s going to shift over and it’s going to be companies in the S&P 500 who are the first to produce here. Those are the ones going to lead to recovery. And it’s going to happen. Dow 50,000. I guarantee that and I guarantee no recession.”
Navarro’s optimism wasn’t matched by JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, who warned in his annual letter to shareholders Monday that Trump’s tariffs would raise prices, slow the global economy and weaken America’s standing in the world by tearing up its alliances. Even some of Trump’s allies, including Elon Musk and Bill Ackman, have recently warned that tariffs are bad policy that rely on extremely flawed logic.
US stocks tumbled on Wednesday with tariff fears returning to Wall Street in earnest, as Nvidia (NVDA) revealed costly new curbs on chip exports to China and Fed Chair Jerome Powell warned of the “challenging” impacts to come from the uncertainty around President Trump’s trade policy.
The benchmark S&P 500 (^GSPC) dropped more than 2.2% while the Dow Jones Industrial Average (^DJI) shed roughly 700 points, or around 1.7%. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite (^IXIC) fell over 3% as the new chip provisions weighed on the tech sector.
Stocks hit session lows on Wednesday afternoon as Powell said during a speech in Chicago that the central bank will “wait for greater clarity” before considering any interest rate adjustments. He said he expects Trump’s tariffs to generate “higher inflation and slower growth.”
“We may find ourselves in the challenging scenario in which our dual-mandate goals are in tension,” Powell said.
Meanwhile, AI chip giant Nvidia also found itself caught in the crossfire of the burgeoning US-China trade war. Shares fell about 7% after the company revealed that the US government has imposed new restrictions on its chip exports to China. The company said the move would result in $5.5 billion in charges.
In an exclusive interview with Yahoo Finance on Tuesday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessett said he expects to see “substantial clarity” on tariffs with major US trading partners, excluding China, over the next 90 days. For its part, China said Wednesday it is open to US talks, but only under certain conditions.
Meanwhile, consumers are already responding to the tariffs. Census Bureau data Wednesday showed retail sales rose more than 1.4% in March, the biggest clip in over two years, as consumers “front-loaded” purchases ahead of anticipated tariffs.
In commodities, gold (GC=F) reached a new record as the escalating trade war continues to push investors toward safe havens.
Asia-Pacific markets traded mostly lower Wednesday after Wall Street declined overnight as investors assessed quarterly earnings, while tariff worries continued to weigh on investor sentiment.
Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index fell 1.91% to close at 21,056.98. Mainland China’s CSI 300 added 0.31% to close at 3,772.82, after China’s economy expanded by a better-than-expected 5.4% in the first quarter. This comes even as U.S. tariff threats have prompted major investment banks to slash the country’s annual growth outlook. Reuters’ economists had expected a 5.1% expansion year on year.
Japan’s Nikkei 225 fell 1.01% to close at 33,920.4. South Korea’s Kospi fell 1.21% to close at 2,447.43 while the small-cap Kosdaq lost 1.80% to end the trading day at 699.11.
Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 closed the trading day at 7,758.9.
UBS recently downgraded its GDP forecast for China to 3.4% for 2025, and to 3% next year. The investment bank’s chief China economist, Tao Wang, estimates that tariff hikes imposed by the U.S. on Chinese goods will cause a more than 2 percentage points drag on China’s GDP growth.
Bloomberg on Tuesday reported that China had ordered all airlines to halt deliveries of Boeing jets amid a tit-for-tat tariff war with the U.S. This move could increase chances of a negotiation, according to Louis Navellier, founder and chairman of Navellier & Associates.
“The probability of a resolution of the trade spat between China and the U.S. is now expected since Boeing and the technology industry are likely putting pressure on the White House,” said Navellier.
U.S. stock futures slipped as investors looked ahead to the release of a key retail sales report and more earnings from the first-quarter season. Dow Jones Industrial Average futures dropped 139 points, or 0.3%. S&P 500 futures and Nasdaq 100 futures dipped 0.7% and 1.1%, respectively.
Overnight in the U.S., the three major averages fell. The Dow Jones Industrial Average lost 155.83 points, or 0.38%, to close at 40,368.96. The S&P 500 declined 0.17% and ended at 5,396.63. The Nasdaq Composite ticked down 0.05% and settled at 16,823.17. The three averages slipped following back-to-back winning sessions.