GM drowning in unsold BrightDrop vans as mounting EV inventory sparks mass layoffs

General Motors’ all-electric CAMI Assembly plant in Ontario is halting production of BrightDrop delivery vans, Unifor said Friday. Unifor is Canada’s largest private sector union, representing 320,000 workers. The company will initiate temporary layoffs starting April 14 and production will stall for three weeks, Mike Van Boekel, plant chair for Unifor Local 88, which represents hourly workers at CAMI, told the Detroit Free Press. Workers will return for two weeks in May for limited production, and then the factory will close for another 20 weeks. During this downtime, GM plans to complete retooling work to prepare the facility for production of the 2026 model year of commercial electric vehicles. CAMI Assembly had run two shifts while producing Chevrolet BrightDrop vehicles. When production resumes in October, Unifor said the plant will operate on a single shift for the foreseeable future — a reduction expected to impact 450 workers. “This is devastating for our members,” Van Boekel told the Detroit Free Press. “We are losing these shifts indefinitely.” About 1,200 Local 88 members work there assembling Chevrolet BrightDrop EVs and constructing battery modules and packs. “This is a crushing blow to hundreds of working families in Ingersoll and the surrounding region who depend on this plant,” Unifor National President Lana Payne said in the statement. “General Motors must do everything in its power to mitigate job loss during this downturn, and all levels of government must step up to support Canadian autoworkers and Canadian-made products.” GM Canada confirmed CAMI is making operational and employment adjustments to balance inventory and align production schedules with current demand. “GM remains committed to the future of BrightDrop, and the CAMI plant and will support employees through the transition,” the company said in a statement emailed to the Free Press. “This adjustment is directly related to responding to market demand and rebalancing inventory. Production of BrightDrop and EV battery assembly will remain at CAMI.”

Many hurdles

GM’s struggles with BrightDrop inventory come less than a year after the company folded the commercial vans into its Chevrolet brand in a bid to boost its performance. GM has tried and failed to gain ground against competitors, including Ford and Rivian, in the electric van space, an effort further hindered by the vehicle’s high price tag. Sam Fiorani, vice president of global vehicle forecasting at AutoForecast Solutions, said the opaque trade environment spurred by President Donald Trump’s vacillating tariff announcements hardly aided the company’s U.S. sales projections. “If there’s a tariff with Canada, how do you build any vehicle of volume there to be sold in the U.S.?” Fiorani asked. Tariffs with Canada currently stand at 25%, though the auto industry is still seeking clarity about whether vehicles and parts compliant with the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement are included. GM produces BrightDrop 400 and BrightDrop 600 vans at CAMI Assembly, Canada’s — and GM’s — first full-scale all-electric vehicle manufacturing plant, which required massive investment to retool for EV production, including funding support from both governments. As the Free Press first reported, a glut of those slow-selling delivery vans has built up on both sides of the U.S.-Canada border. CAMI produced 3,500 electric Chevrolet BrightDrop delivery vans last year — compared with nearly 200,000 Chevrolet Equinox crossovers the plant produced five years earlier — according to the Automotive News Data & Research Center. Of those, GM sold only 1,529, compared with Ford’s 12,610 E-Transit vehicles and Rivian’s 13,243 EDV. GM reported sales of just 274 Chevrolet BrightDrop vehicles so far this year, up 7% from 256 sold in the first quarter of 2024. Last month, a Free Press photographer captured images of hundreds of vehicles lining a Flint storage lot. Reuters published similar photos from CAMI in Ingersoll, Ontario. CAMI reopened in late 2022 following a retooling period outfitting the facility for electric vehicle production. Production stalled again this year with a scheduled two-week shutdown to “align production schedules and balance inventory,” a GM spokesperson said in a statement. Part of the reason BrightDrop sales are lagging in the U.S. is the comparatively high price tag to nearest competitors. Before incentives, the vehicles cost about $74,000. Ford’s E-Transit van with extended battery range, for example, is $51,600 — more than $20,000 cheaper — even before applying incentives.

Falling far short of projections

GM launched BrightDrop in 2021 as a wholly owned subsidiary with expectations its revenue would top $10 billion by 2030 with low-20% profit margins. BrightDrop CEO Travis Katz said in 2022 that the company expected to be making 50,000 trucks a year starting in 2025 and bring in “a lot of revenue.” Katz left the company in late 2023 without specifying why as GM began reorganizing BrightDrop to function less independently and reduce costs. “Make no mistake — the world is moving rapidly towards electrification. If Canada and the U.S. hit pause now, we may never catch up,” Payne said in the statement. “We risk surrendering our future unless we act decisively to support our own industry.” The economics, and the lack of charging infrastructure, likely made it difficult for the company to find a foothold in the U.S. market, Fiorani said. “It should be easy to convince a business that you can drive this thing. On paper, it’s a good idea. But business owners that are not used to taking risks won’t buy something they don’t understand fully,” he said. “In early 2020, when everybody was delivering things directly to their homes, this was a perfect vehicle for that market.”
Trump’s ongoing 25% auto tariffs expected to cut sales by millions, cost $100 billion

DETROIT — As President Donald Trump’s 25% tariffs on imported vehicles remain in effect despite a pullback this week on other country-based levies, analysts are expecting massive global implications for the automotive industry due to the policies. They’re expecting to see a drop in vehicle sales in the millions, higher new and used vehicle prices, and increased costs of more than $100 billion for the industry, according to research reports from Wall Street and automotive analysts. “What we’re seeing now is a structural shift, driven by policy, that’s likely to be long-lasting,” Felix Stellmaszek, Boston Consulting Group’s global lead of automotive and mobility, told CNBC. “This may well be the most consequential year for the auto industry in history – not just because of immediate cost pressures, but because it’s forcing fundamental change in how and where the industry builds.” BCG expects tariffs to add $110 billion to $160 billion on an annual run rate basis in costs to the industry, which could impact 20% of U.S. new-vehicle market revenues, increasing production costs for both U.S. and non-U.S. manufacturers. The Center for Automotive Research, a Michigan-based nonprofit think tank, believes costs for automakers in the U.S. alone will increase by $107.7 billion. That includes $41.9 billion for Detroit automakers General Motors, Ford Motor and Chrysler parent Stellantis. Both analyses take into account the 25% tariffs on imported vehicles implemented by Trump on April 3 as well as forthcoming levies of the same amount on automotive parts that are set to begin by May 3.
BlackRock’s Larry Fink says U.S. is very close to a recession and may be in one now

BlackRock CEO Larry Fink told CNBC on Friday that he thinks the U.S. economy has weakened to the point of growth possibly turning negative.

“I think we’re very close, if not in, a recession now,” Fink said on “Squawk on the Street.”

Fears of an economic slowdown have risen sharply since President Donald Trump unveiled widespread tariffs last week, sparking a sell-off in the stock market. Trump on Wednesday announced that he was pausing some of those import levies for 90 days, but that move has not been enough to restore confidence in the economy, Fink said.

“I think you’re going to see, across the board, just a slowdown until there’s more certainty. And we now have a 90-day pause on the reciprocal tariffs — that means longer, more elevated uncertainty,” Fink said Friday.

Surveys of consumers and business leaders have shown weakening sentiment in recent months. However, other pieces of economic data like job growth and retail sales have held up better. Fink said consumers may have been stocking up on goods ahead of the threatened tariffs, which could be masking some underlying economic weakness.

Despite his concerns, Fink said he did not think the U.S. was in a financial crisis and he expects “megatrends” in the economy like artificial intelligence would persist.

At an event for the Economic Club of New York on Monday, Fink said that other CEOs also think the U.S. is “probably in a recession.”

Fink’s latest remarks come after BlackRock announced its first-quarter financial results. In a press release Friday morning, the CEO commented that “uncertainty and anxiety about the future of markets and the economy are dominating client conversations.”

The asset management giant’s financial results were mixed. BlackRock reported $11.30 in adjusted earnings per share for the first quarter, above the $10.14 expected by Wall Street analysts, according to LSEG. However, $5.28 billion in revenue was short of the $5.34 billion consensus estimate.

On the assets front, BlackRock reported $84 billion in net inflows during the quarter and ended March with nearly $11.58 trillion under management.

Shares of the firm rose 2.3% on Friday.

Trump administration changes course on in-person requirements for Social Security

The Trump administration is further backing off the in-person requirements it announced for Americans seeking services at the Social Security Administration that were set to go into effect Monday.

Liz Huston, a spokesperson for the White House, said in a statement to NPR on Thursday that telephone services will continue for people seeking services through the agency.

“President Trump has repeatedly promised to protect Social Security and uproot waste, fraud and abuse across the federal government,” she said. “The Social Security anti-fraud team has worked around the clock in person to improve technological capabilities and they are now able to identify fraud on claims filed over the telephone.”

Social Security officials first announced last month that people filing claims or seeking benefits would have to travel in-person to a local field office, if they were unable to use the agency’s online verification system. The policy would have effectively eliminated widely used telephone services for many beneficiaries.

These changes were met with concerns from advocates for seniors and people with disabilities, as well as lawmakers. Dozens of Democratic members of Congress sent a letter to agency leaders asking them to reconsider the change because it would “create additional barriers” for people seeking services — “particularly for those who live far from an office.”

The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a left-leaning think tank based in Washington advocating for “economic justice,” recently published an analysis that found the travel requirement would have amounted to a “45-mile trip for some 6 million seniors.”

According to a White House official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to speak generally about the Trump administration’s position, the Social Security Administration reversed course on these requirements because the anti-fraud team “implemented new technological capabilities so quickly” that the agency can now “perform anti-fraud checks on all claims filed over the phone.”

These technological improvements, the official said in a statement, will be able to flag abnormal behavior in a person’s account and then those individuals who were flagged would be required to travel in-person for verification.

In a statement, Max Richtman, president and CEO of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, called this reversal “a victory for Social Security beneficiaries across the country.”

“The Trump administration did not change the policy out of the goodness of their hearts,” he said. “They responded to public pressure. This is a victory for advocacy on the grassroots and national level, by and on behalf of the millions of seniors who depend on phone service from the Social Security Administration.”

“The Trump administration has been busy erecting barriers for people simply trying to access their earned benefits. We are glad this one barrier has fallen.”

The Social Security Administration is currently undergoing massive changes – including widespread layoffs, regional office closures and general restructuring of duties across the agency. These changes have worried advocates about access to services that many of the country’s seniors rely on.

Morgan Stanley earnings boosted by record equity trading, but stock dips on fear it may not be sustained

Morgan Stanley’s stock fell 1% Friday in morning trading, after the bank’s first-quarter earnings topped consensus estimates thanks to a record performance in stock trading that some analysts fear may not be sustained.

The stock, like those of its big bank peers, has been volatile in recent sessions as President Donald Trump’s tariffs have created unprecedented U.S. market turmoil. The stock has fallen 16% in 2025, while the S&P 500
SPX +1.81% has fallen 10%.

Brian Mulberry, client portfolio manager at Zacks Investment Management with $20.4 billion of assets under management, said the 45% increase in equities trading to a record $4.1 billion was much higher than expected.

Combined with net new assets in wealth management of $94 billion, which helped drive revenue comfortably above consensus.

However, “The recent market volatility could impact both these segments in the short term as markets have lost 15-20% of value amid uncertainty in trade, tariffs and taxes,” Mulberry said in emailed comments.

“There is still time to recover in the current quarter, but we will be paying close attention to see if the asset flows and trading volumes continue to add growth in this difficult time.”

Morgan Stanley

MS +1.44% posted net income of $4.3 billion, or $2.60 a share, for the quarter, up from $3.4 billion, or $2.02 a share, in the year-earlier period. Revenue rose to $17.7 billion from $15.1 billion a year ago.

The FactSet consensus was for EPS of $2.21 and revenue of $16.5 billion.

“Institutional Securities strong performance was led by our Markets business,” Chief Executive Ted Pick said in prepared remarks.

Revenue at the institutional securities business rose to $8.9 billion from $7 billion a year ago, ahead of the $7.8 billion FactSet consensus. Equity trading rose from $2.8 billion a year ago, boosted by strength in Asia.

Fixed-income net revenue rose to $2.6 billion from $2.5 billion a year ago, boosted by foreign-exchange gains in a more volatile trading environment.

Investment-banking revenue rose to $1.6 billion from $1.4 billion a year ago, matching the FactSet consensus. Revenue was boosted by strong fixed-income underwriting that offset a decline in equity underwriting owing to a dearth of deals.

In wealth management, revenue rose to $7.3 billion from $6.9 billion a year ago, reflecting strength in asset management and higher levels of client activity. The FactSet consensus was for revenue of $7.4 billion.

The business added $94 billion in net new assets, while fee-based asset flows rose to $29.8 billion from $26.2 billion a year ago.

In investment management, revenue rose to $1.6 billion from $1.4 billion, ahead of the $1.5 billion FactSet consensus, as average assets under management rose to $1.7 trillion from $1.5 trillion a year ago.

The bank set aside $135 million in loan-loss reserves after a drawdown of $6 million a year ago.

On a call with analysts, Pick acknowledged the “less predictable” outlook in the current “adjustment period.” Other bank chiefs have also addressed Trump’s tariffs and trade wars in their earnings Friday, which they agree have introduced deep uncertainty to markets and the economy.

The stock, bond and currency markets are exhibiting the kind of overnight and intraday volatility that reflect rapidly changing probability assessments of different policy outcomes,” Pick said, according to a FactSet transcript.

The simple truth is: “we do not yet know where trade policy will settle, nor do we know what the actual transmission effects will be on the real economy,” he said.

As a result, some of the bank’s clients are “deferring strategic activity” while others are pushing ahead, he said.

Overall, Pick is not expecting the economy to go into recession, and believes clients have hit the pause button, but not the delete button, he said.

Chief Financial Officer Sharon Yeshaya said the company’s pipelines have not meaningfully changed since the start of the year and remain robust.

But the timing of deal execution “remains sensitive to market conditions,” while demand for strategic advice and capital raising is still there.

Indonesia’s $48 billion social security fund eyes doubling equities exposure

JAKARTA, April 11 (Reuters) – Indonesia’s $48 billion social security fund BPJS Ketenagakerjaan, the country’s largest institutional investor, aims to raise the share of local equities in its portfolio to up to 20% within three years, a top official told Reuters on Friday.

Asked about this week’s local stock market (.JKSE), opens new tab tumble following the global turmoil caused by U.S. tariffs, Edwin Ridwan, the agency’s director of investment development, said it had created room for the fund to invest in undervalued shares.

The state-owned fund has been increasing its investment gradually in stocks with big market capitalisation, he said, in sectors such as banking, telecommunications, commodities and consumer goods.
“These are the conditions where people are selling, if we look at history … whenever the market overshoots, people are selling, it’s the best time to buy,” he said in an interview, referring to the financial crises of 1998 and 2008 and the COVID-19 pandemic.
“The window has started to open up for us to increase our exposure to equities, because we need volume, we need liquidity, and with everybody
selling, that liquidity is being provided.”
Edwin added that the fund was targeting a 13% year-on-year increase in returns in 2025.
BPJS Ketenagakerjaan’s current exposure to equities was at around 10% or equivalent to $4.8 billion, either directly in the stock market or through mutual funds, it said, adding that its target is to expand that to between 15% and 20% within three years. The largest portion is invested in bonds, and the rest is in deposits and other instruments.
Indonesia’s stock market tanked when it reopened on Tuesday after an extended holiday break, triggering a 30-minute trading halt in response to the global turmoil over U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs announcement days earlier. The market has since regained some of its losses.
President Prabowo Subianto is looking to increase the state’s role in achieving its 8% growth target, including via the setting up of a new sovereign wealth fund managing more than $900 billion in assets as well as a state firm to run confiscated palm plantations.
Since the global turmoil hit Indonesian markets, the country has also eased buyback rules for publicly listed companies, including state-run firms, and Bank Indonesia intervened “aggressively” to support a plummeting rupiah.
Asked whether there was any order from the government for BPJS to support the falling stock market, Edwin said the agency was “quite independent.”

‘TOO BIG FOR THE MARKET’

The agency has been trying for years to get government approval to invest in overseas financial markets, especially equity markets, Edwin said, citing its need to have more options for its large funds.
“Basically we have a very limited universe…so we can’t get in and out easily and we can’t buy when other people buy,” he said, referring to the risk of crowding out the market.
The agency’s assets under management have been expanding at a rate of 13% to 14% per year, and it receives up to 10 trillion rupiah ($595 million) per month from premiums paid by members, Edwin said, explaining why it needs to find more investment instruments.
Possible pressure on the rupiah has been one consideration against overseas investment, Edwin said, but he added that foreign exchange supply could be improved via return repatriation.
($1 = 16,790.0000 rupiah)
Why some are accusing Trump of manipulating stock markets

Wall Street has been whipsawed for more than a week by President Trump’s every word about tariffs. Now he’s facing accusations of using his power to deliberately manipulate the markets. The scrutiny started with a tale of two social media posts. On Wednesday, shortly after the U.S. stock market opened, Trump posted on his Truth Social network in all caps: “THIS IS A GREAT TIME TO BUY!!!” Less than four hours after his post, Trump said on Truth Social that he would pause the harshest of his tariffs on most countries. Stocks immediately skyrocketed in relief, with the Dow closing up almost 3,000 points — meaning that any investors who had followed Trump’s advice in the morning and bought into the stock market right away would have made quite a bit of money by the end of the day. Prior to his post, share prices had been plummeting for days, as fears mounted about the economic damage Trump’s new trade policies could cause. Powerful investors and billionaire business leaders had increasingly gone public airing their worries about the new tariffs and the resulting financial panic. By Wednesday afternoon, Trump seemed to hear them when he hit pause. Now some Democratic lawmakers and government ethics experts are calling for investigations into whether Trump was attempting to deliberately manipulate the markets, or to enable others to trade on insider information. Sens. Adam Schiff, Democrat from California, and Ruben Gallego, Democrat from Arizona, sent a letter to the White House on Wednesday requesting “an urgent inquiry into whether President Trump, his family, or other members of the administration engaged in insider trading or other illegal financial transactions, informed by advanced knowledge” of his tariff policy changes. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, Democrat from Massachusetts, also called for an investigation, asking on the floor of Congress if this was “corruption in plain sight.” White House spokesperson Kush Desai accused Democrats of “playing partisan games” and tells NPR that Trump’s early-morning post was merely meant to calm investors’ fears. “”It is the responsibility of the President of the United States to reassure the markets and Americans about their economic security,” he wrote in an emailed statement.

George W. Bush’s former chief ethics lawyer says such statements would have led to firing

But the criticisms of Trump’s two Truth Social posts aren’t just limited to his partisan opponents. “We can’t have senior public officials — including the president — talking about stock prices and where to buy or to sell at the same time as they are making and announcing decisions that have a dramatic impact on stock prices,” says Richard Painter, a law professor at the University of Minnesota, who previously served as the chief ethics lawyer for President George W. Bush. If anyone in the Bush administration had made similar public statements urging people to buy or sell stocks, Painter added, “that person probably would [have been] fired.” Painter did not accuse President Trump of market manipulation: “We don’t have clear evidence of that here,” he tells NPR. But he pointed out that the president already has a track record of pushing the boundaries, at the very least. “Financial conflicts of interests for President Trump have been a concern since he was first elected in 2016,” Painter says, adding that the problems today are even greater. Trump’s embrace of the crypto industry, for example, has drawn ongoing scrutiny: The president, who has a growing personal portfolio of cryptocurrency-related businesses, has appointed pro-crypto Cabinet officials and promised the industry much friendlier regulation.

It’s up to the SEC to investigate accusations of insider trading

Despite the wide-ranging calls for investigations into Trump’s social media posts on Wednesday, Painter and others aren’t expecting to see much happen. The Republican lawmakers who control both the House and Senate have shown little interest in picking fights with Trump. Nor do ethics experts expect much movement from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which investigates accusations of insider trading. On Wednesday, the Senate voted to confirm Trump nominee Paul Atkins to lead the SEC. And Trump in February signed an executive order claiming more power over independent regulatory agencies, including the SEC. An SEC spokesperson declined to comment on the matter.
Trump has 90 days to do 150 trade deals. Financial markets aren’t buying it

President Donald Trump and his advisers said this was the plan all along: Scare the bejesus out of the world by announcing astronomically high tariffs, get countries to come to the negotiating table, and — with the exception of China — back away from the most punishing trade barriers as America works out new trade agreements around the globe. But Trump’s 90-day pause on his “reciprocal” tariffs that were never actually reciprocal gives his administration just three months to strike enormously complex trade deals with dozens of countries that it says are lining up to negotiate. Financial markets aren’t buying it. Stocks have whipsawed as volatility has spiked. And other markets, including oil, bonds and the dollar, are sending a clear message of deep skepticism that Trump will be able to pull this one off.

Stocks

Following another steep sell-off Thursday, stocks appeared calmer — for now — and posted strong gains Friday. The Dow ended the day higher by 619 points, or 1.56%. The S&P 500 rose 1.81% and the Nasdaq was 2.06% higher. Markets were buoyed by Boston Federal Reserve President Susan Collins telling the Financial Times Friday that the central bank would step in to support financial markets if there were signs of distress. But stock market investors have been trading on a knife’s edge, and any announcement coming from the Trump administration on tariffs has the ability to send stocks surging or tumbling. For example, stocks plunged Thursday after the Trump administration clarified the math it had already used to set China’s massive 145% tariff. The street had believed the tariff was 125%. The Dow sank sharply, at one point falling more than 2,000 points. In the 129-year history of the Dow Jones Industrial Average, the index has closed higher or lower by at least 1,000 points just 31 times. Four of those times happened in the past week. The S&P 500 fell by just over 9% across the first week of April, its biggest one-week drop since March 2020. The benchmark index gained 5.7% this week, its biggest one-week gain since 2023. Despite Wednesday’s historic gain after Trump announced his detente, stocks remain well below where they were trading before the president presented his “Liberation Day” tariff plan on April 2.

Bonds

The bond market is acting weirdly. Typically, you’d expect bond prices to rise throughout periods of turmoil. US Treasuries are historically considered to be the safest of safe assets, backed up by the full faith and credit of the US government. But bonds aren’t rising — they’re falling. That’s largely because investors have lost faith in US trade policy, and they fear America could get hurt even worse than the countries Trump’s tariff policy is targeting. As JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon said in his annual letter to shareholders Monday, Trump’s “America First” policy risks alienating its most important partners and the country’s special standing in the world. US Treasury yields, which trade in opposite direction to prices, briefly surged on Friday above 4.5%. They were under 4% earlier in the week. That represents a massive move for the market. Higher yields could hurt America’s economy, as a number of consumer loans are closely tied to those rates. “The upward action in rates has been rapid in historical context and has provided no comfort to investors looking for havens in turbulent markets,” analysts at Citi said in a Friday note. US Treasuries were on track for their worst week since 2019, according to Bloomberg’s US Treasury total return index, when the New York Federal Reserve had to step in and purchase Treasuries to bring down a spike in yields caused by a liquidity crunch. “Current market conditions don’t require Fed intervention at this point, but Fed officials are likely monitoring market function closely,” said Chip Hughey, managing director for fixed income at Truist Advisory Services. Dimon said Friday on an earnings call that he expects there will be a “kerfuffle” in the Treasury markets that would lead to the Federal Reserve intervening. “They’re not going to do it now … they’ll do it when they start to panic a little bit,” Dimon said.

Oil

The oil market has been trading like we’re going into a recession. Prices have tumbled over the course of the past couple of weeks as investors feared Trump’s trade policy could sap demand for travel, shipping and transportation — all of which require fuel. US oil on Friday morning fell below $60 a barrel, close to a four-year low, before recovering slightly. Brent, the global benchmark, was hovering around $63 a barrel, the lowest since April 2021, before also gaining slightly. Oil gained on Friday after US Energy Secretary Chris Wright told reporters that the US could stop Iran’s oil exports as part of Trump’s negotiations over the nation’s nuclear program, according to Reuters. US oil settled up 2.4% at $61.50 a barrel. Brent rose 2.26% to $64.76 a barrel. Yet concerns remain about the impact of tariffs on economic growth and how a potential slowdown could disrupt demand for oil. Oil prices have served as a prime recession indicator in recent years. Prices tumbled after surging above $100 a barrel for the first time as the Great Recession took hold in 2008. And prices went negative for the first time during the pandemic as a glut of oil became so severe that traders were literally paying storage facilities to take the unwanted oil off their hands.

Dollar

The dollar on Friday tumbled to its lowest level in three years. That’s the opposite of what you’d expect when tariffs are put in place. Typically, tariffs raise the value of a local currency, because it encourages residents to purchase homemade goods instead of foreign options, stretching their money further in comparison to other currencies. But currency traders have sold off the dollar, because they believe America will bear the brunt of Trump’s trade war fallout and end up comparatively weaker than before tariffs were put in place. The dollar on Friday hit its lowest level against the euro since 2022. The dollar index — which measures the dollar against a basket of currencies — fell 0.9% Friday after tanking 2% Thursday, which was its worst single-day drop since 2022. Those are massive moves in currency trading world. “Investors and central banks are selling Treasuries and dollars due to a loss of confidence and credibility in American assets,” said Joe Brusuelas, chief economist RSM. “Financial chaos has its cost.” Meanwhile, gold prices surged above a record high $3,200 a troy ounce on Friday. Gold is up more than 23% this year and just posted its best quarter since 1986. The yellow metal is considered a safe haven amid economic and political uncertainty.

Trade deals

Despite financial markets casting enormous doubt that the Trump administration can salvage the opportunity it created for itself to strike bilateral trade agreements with all 150 countries around the world, the Trump administration remains optimistic. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said this week that more than 70 countries have asked to meet with US representatives to strike a deal that could get them out from under the thumb of Trump’s punishing tariffs. Although the administration has provided few details of which countries it is negotiating with, it said it would favor allies like South Korea and Japan first. But trade deals are incredibly complex arrangements usually negotiated over the course of years, not months. And even if Trump were to negotiate trade with all those countries over a short period — whether full deals or letters of agreement that put a framework of a deal together — China, the world’s biggest exporter, remains the elephant in the room. US tariffs on China are now at at least 145% and China on Friday retaliated with 125% tariffs of its own. That will do enormous damage to the world’s two largest economies, and both sides have said they are not eager to back down. China has consistently said it is open to negotiations, but wants to do it in a way in which it will be respected. China has ignored America’s warnings not to raise its tariffs, according to a source familiar with the discussions. In the meantime, economists have been unmoved by Trump’s sudden change in tune. Although negotiated trade agreements would undoubtedly be good news for the economy, much of the damage has already been done, Wall Street economists have argued. And punishing 10% universal tariffs remain in place, as do 25% tariffs on autos, 25% tariffs on some goods from Mexico and Canada, and 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum. That’s why JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs say the likelihood of the United States and the global economies going into a recession this year are basically a coin flip. This story has been updated with additional developments and context.
10-year Treasury yield tops 4.5% after surge this week that’s worrying Wall Street and the White House

The 10-year Treasury yield climbed higher Friday, adding to its steep weekly rise, as dizzying trade moves by President Donald Trump caused investors to dump U.S. assets in favor of other global safe havens. The benchmark 10-year Treasury yield advanced 9 basis points to 4.486%. It earlier jumped to its highest level since Feb. 13. The 2-year Treasury yield climbed 12 basis points on the day at 3.97%. One basis point is equal to 0.01% and yields move inversely to prices. The 10-year yield this week has risen more than 50 basis points this week after ending last week around 4%, marking one of the biggest spikes on record. The move marks a stark reversal in how investors view Treasurys. Traditionally, investors have turned to U.S. debt as a safe haven during tumultuous times. That doesn’t appear to be the case this week as China and Japan appeared to be selling Treasurys amid the heightened trade tensions, traders speculated. The move higher may have complicated the White House’s approach to trade. Trump announced a 90-day tariff pause on most countries on Wednesday and reduced duties to a universal rate of 10%. The reprieve excluded China, which saw U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports rise to 145%. China struck back against the U.S. on Friday, raising its duties on American goods from 84% to 125%. While some administrations officials have said this reversal was always the plan, the dramatic spike in yields likely pressured them to pause. “Scott Bessent is keeping a close eye on the bond market. He spoke to the White House and I know he is keeping his eyes on it,” the White House said on Friday. Kevin Hassett, director of Trump’s National Economic Council also told CNBC on Thursday “the fact that the bond market was telling us, ‘Hey, it’s probably time to move,’ certainly would have contributed at least a little bit to that thinking.” “But it wasn’t the bond market that made a panic move, because there was a very systematic, well-planned move that was just about to happen that just turned out to be the same time,” Hassett added. Seema Shah, chief global strategist at Principal Asset Management, added that the bond market “likely struck a nerve with the Trump administration.” “They have repeatedly emphasized their focus on bond yields and even celebrated last week when Treasury bond yields dipped below 4%. Low financing costs appear to be a key pillar of the Trump administration’s overall agenda, so the reversal in market trends, surging Treasury yields, undoubtedly caused significant concern in the White House,” Shah said. Despite the pause, however, rates resumed their upward climb to the high levels that previously sparked concerned for the White House.
US consumer sentiment plummets to second-lowest level on records going back to 1952

Americans are rarely this pessimistic about the economy. Consumer sentiment plunged 11% this month to a preliminary reading of 50.8, the University of Michigan said in its latest survey released Friday, the second-lowest reading on records going back to 1952. April’s reading was lower than anything seen during the Great Recession. President Donald Trump’s volatile trade war, which threatens higher inflation, has significantly weighed on Americans’ moods these past few months. That malaise worsened leading up to Trump’s announcement last week of sweeping tariffs, according to the survey. “This decline was, like the last month’s, pervasive and unanimous across age, income, education, geographic region and political affiliation,” Joanne Hsu, the survey’s director, said in a release. “Sentiment has now lost more than 30% since December 2024 amid growing worries about trade war developments that have oscillated over the course of the year,” she added. The Federal Reserve and Wall Street are watching closely how souring sentiment translates into consumer spending, which accounts for about 70% of the US economy, and whether Americans lose faith that inflation will return to normal in the coming years. Trump on Wednesday paused his massive tariff hike on dozens of countries for 90 days, but kept in place a 10% baseline duty for all imports into the US and separate tariffs on specific products and commodities. The so-called reciprocal tariffs, albeit short lived, were the sharpest increase in US duties ever on data going back 200 years, Fitch Ratings told CNN China, however, wasn’t included in Trump’s tariff reprieve, continuing a contentious tit-for-tat between the world’s two largest economies that stretched into Friday, with Beijing jacking up its retaliatory tariffs on US imports to 125% from 84%. The Michigan survey was fielded between March 25 and April 8, so it doesn’t capture respondents’ reaction to the recently announced tariff delay.

The relationship between sentiment and spending

In economics, surveys are referred to as “soft data” and measures capturing actual economic activity, such as retail sales, are known as “hard data.” The soft data has clearly deteriorated because of Trump’s tariffs: The latest Michigan survey showed that “the share of consumers expecting unemployment to rise in the year ahead increased for the fifth consecutive month and is now more than double the November 2024 reading and the highest since 2009,” according to a release. Yet, the hard data still looks decent. Employers continue to hire at a brisk pace and shoppers haven’t convincingly reined in their spending just yet, though retail sales have come in weaker than expected recently. “Sometimes the surveys are very negative, but they keep spending,” Fed Chair Jerome Powell said last week at an event near Washington, DC. “People spent right through the pandemic and they spent right through this time of higher inflation.” Still, the hard data could take a turn for the worse. New York Fed President John Williams said Friday at an event in Puerto Rico that he expects economic growth to slow sharply this year, pushing up unemployment, and for inflation to accelerate. “Given the combination of the slowdown in labor force growth due to reduced immigration and the combined effects of uncertainty and tariffs, I now expect real GDP growth will slow considerably from last year’s pace, likely to somewhat below 1%,” he said. Spending by better-off Americans has played a key role in keeping the US economy humming along these past few years, but the recent turbulence on Wall Street, triggered by Trump’s tariffs, is putting that under threat. “Wealthy consumers’ stock market gains kept the economy growing in 2024 despite high prices, but the wealthy won’t feel confident enough to keep spending if this keeps up,” Bill Adams, chief economist at Comerica Bank, wrote in a recent analyst note. Larry Fink, chief executive of BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, said Friday that today’s dense fog of uncertainty, triggered by Trump’s tariffs, is reminiscent of the 2008 global financial crisis. “We’ve seen periods like this before when there were large, structural shifts in policy and markets — like the financial crisis, Covid-19 and surging inflation in 2022. We always stayed connected with clients, and some of BlackRock’s biggest leaps in growth followed,” Fink said. JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon echoed that sentiment, noting Friday after the bank released its latest quarterly earnings: “The economy is facing considerable turbulence (including geopolitics), with the potential positives of tax reform and deregulation and the potential negatives of tariffs and ‘trade wars.’”

A growing worry for the Fed

There’s one survey-based measure that matters a whole lot for the Fed: Americans’ perception of prices. It’s critical because they can be self-fulfilling — if people expect inflation to climb and remain elevated in the long run, they adjust their spending accordingly. So far, that measure has been trending in the wrong direction: Expectations for inflation rates in the year ahead surged to 6.7% this month from 5% in March, the highest level since 1981, while expectations for the next five to 10 years climbed to 4.4% from 4.1%. If people do lose faith that inflation will ever get back to normal in the coming years, that would make it extremely difficult for the Fed’s monetary policy to fight inflation. “History teaches that when higher inflation expectations become entrenched, the road back to price stability is longer, the labor market is weaker and the economic scars are deeper,” Dallas Fed President Lorie Logan said Thursday at an event in Dallas. Inflation expectations these days may be more susceptible than usual to becoming “un-anchored,” since consumers just experienced a period of high inflation, leaving many Americans particularly sensitive to elevated prices.
error: Content is protected !!