European stocks’ stellar start to 2025 snuffed out as tariffs cloud Q1 earnings

European equities’ impressive start to 2025 has been obliterated in three sessions of heavy selling, while executives tot up the potential impact of U.S. tariffs on supply chains, possibly forcing them to ditch previous financial predictions.

U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs are more sweeping than many market players feared, sending global stocks plummeting as investors flee to safe-haven assets amid recession worries.

Companies in Europe’s STOXX 600 (.STOXX), opens new tab index, which had its best first-quarter relative to the U.S. S&P 500 (.SPX), opens new tab in a decade, had been expected to report unbroken quarterly earnings growth through 2025 and into 2026, according to LSEG data.
On Friday, the STOXX 600’s year-to-date performance turned negative. And as of 1000 GMT on Monday, it is down 12% since the April 2 close – just before Trump’s tariff bombshell.
As of last Tuesday, LSEG estimates already showed a 1.5% drop in STOXX 600 company earnings for the first quarter versus the same period last year.
“The higher than expected tariff rates … were not factored into many investors’ or companies’ calculations,” said Magesh Kumar Chandrasekaran, equity strategist at Barclays, adding that if this situation persists it should result in lower growth, and ultimately lower revenues and lower profits for companies.
Some sectors are harder hit than others, raising the prospect of profit warnings, several analysts said, but new guidance might be tricky to calculate.
“The question is will there be enough time for them to actually get those numbers in in time? Because we don’t know what the retaliation measures are going to be from some of the European partners … or even from other countries, in that sort of scenario exact numbers might be lacking in some cases,” said Chandrasekaran.
On Friday, China announced additional tariffs of 34% on U.S. goods.

AUTOMAKERS, SPORTSWEAR, LUXURY

Pal Skirta, equity research analyst at Bankhaus Metzler, said higher tariffs would erode profit margins for automakers, even if they manage to pass on some costs to customers. This wasn’t reflected in 2025 financial forecasts, he said.
In a research note on the luxury and sporting goods sectors, JPMorgan highlighted all the sporting goods companies it covers, as well as Danish jeweller Pandora and French eyewear maker EssilorLuxottica as likely hard hit by tariffs.
“For these companies, our initial, and rough, math would suggest material double-digit negative impacts at EBIT level,” it wrote, referring to earnings before interest and tax.
On Thursday, Pandora (PNDORA.CO), opens new tab forecast a potential hit of around 1.2 billion Danish crowns ($178 million) per year from U.S. tariffs. Its shares have plunged about 20% since April 2’s close.
EssilorLuxottica (ESLX.PA), opens new tab shares have slumped 12% since April 2. It didn’t reply to a request for comment.
JPMorgan analysts also highlighted Swiss watchmakers as vulnerable. Switzerland faces a 31% U.S. import tariff – above the 20% for European Union countries.
Bernstein on Monday slashed its 2025 sales forecast for the broader luxury sector to a 2% sales decline from the previously expected 5% growth.
Since last Wednesday’s close, Cartier owner Richemont’s (CFR.S), opens new tab shares have dropped about 18%, Burberry (BRBY.L), opens new tab is down about 20%, Gucci owner Kering (PRTP.PA), opens new tab is down 19%, and LVMH (LVMH.PA), opens new tab down 13%.
A spokesperson for Burberry said it could not comment ahead of annual results on May 14. Kering declined to comment. LVMH and Richemont did not respond to requests for comment.
UBS analysts covering Europe’s sportswear sector said Trump’s 46% tariff on major supplier Vietnam was far worse than expected.
“Vietnam’s growing role in footwear manufacturing, and given its substantial contribution to U.S. footwear imports, means the tariffs present a material headwind to sector profitability as the companies may not be able to fully offset them,” they wrote.
Shares in Adidas (ADSGn.DE), opens new tab and Puma (PUMG.DE), opens new tab are down around 18% and 19% respectively since April 2.
An Adidas spokesperson declined to comment on the impact of tariffs, saying it was monitoring the evolving situation.
A spokesperson for Puma said the U.S. accounted for 20-25% of the company’s global sales, adding: “We are currently evaluating the situation following the recent announcements and will react swiftly.”

Q1 EARNINGS

With the first-quarter reporting season approaching, companies will have to make some assumptions, according to Guy Stear, head of developed markets strategy at the Amundi Investment Institute.
“Companies will … probably be honest and say look, the world is a very uncertain place, they may do some kind of scenario analysis and they may lay that out for investors,” he said.
Share price volatility on earnings days is already sky-high.
Reactions may focus more on how companies are framing the problem and what they’re doing to manage uncertainty than individual numbers, said Stear.
“The comments one company makes could have ramifications on others,” he said.
Angelo Meda, head of equities and portfolio manager at Banor SIM, said a lot of the bad news may already be priced in for some sectors, which could ward off further big selloffs.
“So let’s be prepared for surprises like a stock that reports poorly but then rises,” he said.
3 strategies to keep your money safe amid market volatility

Stock markets in the U.S. and around the globe have dropped since last week when President Donald Trump introduced tariffs on most imports. The sell-off is causing some Americans to rethink their financial investments, despite financial advisor recommendations to stay the course.

Money flowed in and out just 0.10% of 401(k) balances overall last week, according to data from Alight Solutions, which administers company 401(k) plans.

While small, the share is significant, Alight’s research director Rob Austin said in an email: “This is roughly four times average, because we typically see this level in a month.”

More than half, 53%, of the outflows in the week ending April 4 — $140 million — came from large-cap U.S. equities, he said. Nearly the same amount — 52%, or $138 million — went into stable value funds.

Alight data shows total 401(k) balances fell from $262 billion at the beginning of the week to $245 billion by the end of the day on Friday, a 7% decline on average.

About 70 million Americans participate in 401(k) plans, according to the Investment Company Institute.

The average 401(k) balance was $131,700 at the end of 2024 at Fidelity Investments, one of the nation’s largest retirement plan providers. A 7% decline in that account balance would amount to $9,219 in paper losses in just one week.

To weather a retirement savings squeeze, financial advisors say it’s best to stick to a strategy that reflects your ability to take risks both financially and emotionally. Here are three strategies that can help.

Settle on an investment strategy — and stick to it

An investment policy statement provides a framework for managing your portfolioand helps you avoid making impulse decisions based on the news.

“I strongly believe in sticking to an investment policy statement that reflects my needs, and I tune out the rest of the noise,” said Carolyn McClanahan, a certified financial planner, physician and founder of Life Planning Partners in Jacksonville, Florida. “We are helping our clients do the same.”

Having a strategy can help you feel confident that when you do make changes, they suit your investment goals.

“It is perfectly fine to make some changes if needed. It also means having a discussion about the potential reduced upside [of doing so],” said CFP Lee Baker, the founder of Claris Financial Advisors in Atlanta.

Financial advisors say sticking your head in the sand can be a mistake.

“There are likely to be some tremendous buying opportunities in the wreckage,” Baker said, “but it requires both diligence and patience.”

McClanahan and Baker are both members of the CNBC Financial Advisor Council.

Consider your cash position

For many investors, building a cash cushion is top of mind. For example, when it comes to retirees or those planning to stop working soon, Baker said they might want to take “some risk off the table” and have enough cash “to sustain withdrawals for a year.”

Money market funds can be helpful in retirement and investment portfolios if you plan to retire in the next five years or are already retired, financial advisors and investment strategists say.

These so-called “cash equivalents” are highly liquid investments, and unlike money market accounts at banks and credit unions, these funds can be held in 401(k) plans and other qualified retirement plans. Top money market funds currently yield 4% or more, according to Bankrate.

Adding cash to a high-yield savings account for emergencies can also help create a “buffer” to cover higher everyday expenses due to tariffs. The national average savings account yield is less than 1%, but top yields at some online banks offer rates of 4% or more, according to Bankrate.

Focus on the fundamentals

Even policy makers are uncertain what the economic impact will be from the tariff policy changes. 

The Federal Reserve could move to drive interest rates lower if the economy slows, or adjust rates higher to address inflation concerns. But it’s not clear what will be needed.

“We’re going to need to wait and see how this plays out before we can start to make those adjustments,” Jerome Powell, Chairman of the Federal Reserve, said on Friday during remarks at the Society for the Advancement of Business Editing and Writing conference in Arlington, Virginia.

To help cope with the uncertainty, financial advisors recommend focusing on the fundamentals.

“If a trade war will reduce economic growth, what asset classes should you overweight in that environment? That’s different than changing your allocation because of a policy decision,” said CFP Ivory Johnson, founder of Delancey Wealth Management in Washington, D.C. Johnson is also a member of the CNBC FA Council. “Pay more attention to the data than the narrative.”

How actual ‘fake news’ caused a market whiplash

An errant post on X may have just shaken the stock market, showing how influential — and unreliable — the social media platform can be. Unsourced “headlines” about a potential “90-day pause in tariffs” sent markets into a state of turbulence Monday morning as investors sought any indication of a reprieve from the Trump administration’s new levies. The problem: It wasn’t true. The White House swiftly denied the rumor shortly after it began to circulate online. The false posts may have originated from a real Fox News interview with National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett at around 8:30 a.m. ET. Hassett was asked whether President Donald Trump would “consider a 90-day pause in tariffs,” and he replied in part: “The president is (going to) decide what the president is (going to) decide.” According to CNN’s analysis, the first X post to claim Hassett said Trump would consider a 90-day pause in tariffs came at 10:11 a.m. ET from an account called “Hammer Capital” with the handle “yourfavorito,”which has barely 1,000 followers. At about 10:12 a.m., CNN’s Vanessa Yurkevich, who was on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, said that cheers had broken out, as stock indices — which were already recovering from early-morning lows — suddenly surged. “Walter Bloomberg,” an account with a much larger following that uses the handle “DeItaone” copy-and-pasted the original rumor along with a siren emoji at 10:13 a.m. On CNBC, anchors were seemingly baffled, wondering what was causing the turnaround. CNBC anchor David Faber and his network colleagues wondered aloud about the triggering “headline,” searching their computer screens for a wire service alert or any other indication of what could have caused stock market movements. By 10:15 a.m., CNBC anchors were reading the news on air. “I think we can go with this headline, apparently Hassett’s been saying Trump will consider a 90-day pause in tariffs for all countries except for China,” anchor Carl Quintanilla said. “We’re trying to source that exactly in terms of where that’s coming from,” Faber quickly added. CNBC showed the “headline” on screen less than a minute later. “HASSETT: TRUMP IS CONSIDERING A 90-DAY PAUSE IN TARIFFS FOR ALL COUNTRIES EXPECT CHINA,” the CNBC banner read, as if the news was confirmed. By 10:19, Reuters alerted the supposed comments, citing CNBC. Stocks would later decline as the White House firmly denied the supposed headline. CNBC reporters quickly reported the White House denial, and Reuters updated its stories, later issuing an advisory at 12:28 p.m. withdrawing the original alert along with a statement that the newswire service “regrets its error.” The “Walter Bloomberg” account appears to borrow its name from the Bloomberg financial news service to gain credibility. The account, which has more than 800,000 followers, often posts accurate news flashes from Bloomberg, Reuters and other outlets. “Hammer Capital” also posts headlines, as well as stock market memes. Both that account and “Hammer Capital” do not publicize their real identities. Both have blue checkmarks on X, which used to indicate the account holder’s identity had been verified. But when Musk took over the service formerly known as Twitter, he turned the blue checkmark into a paid service, meaning anyone could pay to appear verified and have their posts boosted on others’ timelines. Once the financial damage was done, “Walter Bloomberg” deleted the post, claiming they first saw it on Reuters, and market participants were left wondering what just happened. “Hammer Capital” said on X they first saw the news on Reuters and CNBC, although Reuters’ flash was at 10:19 a.m., sourced to CNBC. A CNBC spokesperson said in a statement: “As we were chasing the news of the market moves in real-time, we aired unconfirmed information in a banner. Our reporters quickly made a correction on air.” “Hammer Capital” denied making up the headline: “To be as abundantly clear as possible, trading desks started sending out this headline at 10:09. I was regurgitating what the market was reacting to, to my 600 followers. It was an incorrect interpretation of a Fox News interview,” they posted on Monday afternoon. Wherever the original source of the incorrect headline came from, it was amplified by trusted sources in financial news, creating a very expensive lesson in the value of accurate and reliable reporting.
Japan stocks jump 5% as Asia-Pacific markets open higher after previous session’s steep losses

Asia-Pacific markets opened higher Tuesday, rebounding from previous session’s losses over U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariff policy and threats of even higher levies against China. Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 added 0.18% at the open. Japan’s Nikkei 225 rose 5.34% while the Topix gained 5.53%. South Korea’s Kospi rose 2.26% while the small-cap Kosdaq climbed 2.35%. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng index futures were at 19,653, weaker than the HSI’s last close of 19,828.3. Focus will be on Chinese stocks after Trump on Monday threatened additional 50% tariffs on China if Beijing did not lift its duties on U.S. imports. Hong Kong’s stock market led losses in the region on Monday, plummeting over 13% to log its steepest one-day decline since 1997, data from FactSet showed. Trump stuck to his aggressive global tariffs strategy over the weekend, with an initial unilateral 10% tariff going into effect Saturday. Wall Street had been hoping for signs of progress in negotiations between the U.S. and other countries, with the ‘reciprocal’ tariffs set to begin on April 9. “Asian equities suffered their worst rout in years, plunging to multi-year lows in a day marked by panic and uncertainty,” said Murthy Grandhi, company profiles analyst at data and analytics firm GlobalData. “The renewed trade war fears have reignited concerns of a global economic slowdown, shattering already fragile investor confidence,” he said, adding that the path forward hinges on policy clarity and diplomatic engagement. U.S. stock futures rose after the S&P 500 extended its losses for a third day following Trump’s tariffs announcement. Futures tied to the S&P 500 were about 1% higher, while Nasdaq-100 futures gained 1.1%. Futures linked to the Dow Jones Industrial Average jumped 476 points, or 1.2%. Overnight in the U.S., the three major averages closed lower. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell for a third day following President Donald Trump’s tariff rollout, dropping 0.91% to close at 37,965.60.  The Nasdaq Composite inched higher by 0.10% to settle at 15,603.26. The S&P 500 shed 0.23% to end at 5,062.25.
Higher prices are likely for these 10 grocery items when tariffs hit

A trip to the grocery or liquor store is about to become even more expensive, economists say, following the latest round of import tariffs announced by President Trump on Wednesday. Those tariffs — taxes paid by businesses on goods from abroad — come on the heels of a previous round aimed specifically at Canada, Mexico and China. Prices for items such as seafood, coffee, wine, nuts and cheese are all expected to rise. And if you’re tempted to grab a candy bar while you’re in the checkout line, you’ll probably have to pay more for that as well. Food industry analyst Phil Lempert, also the editor of supermarketguru.com, estimates that with the latest tariffs “probably almost half of the products in a supermarket — about 40,000 products — will be affected by these tariffs, whether it’s the entire product or just an ingredient.” Joseph Balagtas, a professor of agricultural economics at Purdue University, says food prices will also be affected by other factors related to tariffs, such as higher costs for fertilizer from Canada and a weaker U.S. dollar. “A main takeaway here is that the country-specific, food-specific tariffs will not tell the whole story,” he says. “This is such a big change in policy that there will be broader implications.” It’s impossible yet to know how much the tariffs will affect prices, but with the 10% tariff for many countries and higher “reciprocal tariffs” on other nations, the tariff rates by country could provide some clues. Here are 10 grocery items you might want to keep an eye on and their country of origin (with tariff rates in parentheses).

Seafood

Some top sources: Chile (10%), India (26%), Indonesia (32%) and Vietnam (46%) are the largest suppliers, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. This category is likely to take a big hit because the U.S. imports the vast majority of its seafood — up to 85% according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration — and several countries that supply fish and shellfish to the U.S. have been among the hardest hit by the tariffs.

Coffee

Top sources: Brazil (10%) and Colombia (10%), according to USDA. The U.S. is the world’s largest importer of coffee, with about 80% of U.S. roasted imports coming from Latin America. More than 60% comes from just two countries — Brazil and Colombia, USDA says.

Fruit

Some top sources: Guatemala (10%), Costa Rica (10%) and Peru (10%) Guatemala and Costa Rica are leading exporters of bananas to the U.S. Guatemala also ships melons, plantains and papayas, according to USDA, while Costa Rica exports pineapples, avocados and mangoes. “These products don’t have a long shelf life, and with the tariffs, we’re going to face significant issues with both price and availability,” Lempert says.

Alcohol

Top sources for wine: the European Union — France, Italy and Spain (20%). New Zealand (10%) and Australia (10%), according to USDA. Top sources for beer: Mexico (25%), the Netherlands and Ireland (both with the EU’s 20% tariff) and Canada (25%) If your favorite summer beverage is Modelo, Corona, Heineken or Guinness, you’ll likely be paying more. Tequila imports from Mexico have also seen a surge in recent years and will be affected by the tariffs. Lempert says the imported alcohol sector is likely “to be clobbered.” He also notes that beer sold in cans is also going to get a double hit due to tariffs on China and other aluminum producers.

Beef

Some top sources: New Zealand (10%) and Australia (10%), according to USDA. Although 90% of beef consumed in the U.S. is domestically produced, tariffs will likely add to existing price pressures. The cost of ground beef for consumers, for example, is already at historic highs and according to the USDA, the U.S. cattle herd is the smallest it’s been since 1951.

Rice

Top sources: Thailand (36%) and India (26%), according to USDA. Although most rice sold in the U.S. is domestically produced, nearly a third is imported, mainly jasmine rice from Thailand and basmati rice from India.

Cheese

Top sources: Italy, France, Spain and the Netherlands (all subject to 20% EU tariff), according to USDA. Parmigiano-Reggiano, brie and Gouda could also see price rises.

Nuts

Top sources: Vietnam (46%), Ivory Coast (21%), Brazil (10%), Thailand (36%), according to the World Bank. Cashews, pecans and macadamia nuts are likely to see the largest price increases.

Chocolate

Top source: Ivory Coast (21%) and Ecuador (10%), according to USDA. The Hershey Company, one of the largest U.S. importers of cocoa beans, says it sources its supply from Brazil, Cameroon, Ivory Coast, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Ghana, Indonesia, Nigeria, Papua New Guinea and Peru. NPR reached out to Hershey, which makes Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups and Kit Kat bars, among others, to inquire about future price increases. A spokesman for Hershey, Todd Scott, said the company could not comment because it is in an earnings window. However, Lempert says the tariffs come on top of “serious increases in cocoa beans for probably the past two or three years because of the weather and the political climate in … Africa.”

Olive oil

Top sources: European Union (20%), particularly Spain, Italy and Greece. “Olive oil prices have gone through the roof,” Lempert says. “They’re going to go even higher.”
Wall Street Turns on Trump: Musk, Ackman, Druckenmiller Sound the Alarm

Wall Street just got loud and it’s not cheering. Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) CEO Elon Musk, Pershing Square’s Bill Ackman (Trades, Portfolio), and hedge legend Stanley Druckenmiller (Trades, Portfolio) are now openly throwing punches at the Trump administration’s tariff plans, warning they could trigger a full-blown market meltdown. What started as scattered criticism has snowballed into a rare, public revolt from some of the most influential voices in investing. Even JPMorgan Chase (NYSE:JPM) CEO Jamie Dimon, once cautiously optimistic, is waving a red flag in his latest letter: We’re not in Kansas anymore. Meanwhile, markets continue their slide, with uncertainty mounting by the hour. Elon Musk didn’t hold back mocking top trade adviser Peter Navarro’s Harvard credentials and calling out the damage tariffs could inflict on Tesla. Bill Ackman (Trades, Portfolio), usually one of Trump’s loudest Wall Street backers, called for an immediate 90-day tariff pause to avoid what he described as a self-induced, economic nuclear winter. The attacks aren’t just emotional they’re aimed at the administration’s math. Both Musk and Ackman questioned the very formula used to justify the tariffs, with Musk posting memes comparing the market fallout to D-Day, portraying Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick as a general calmly watching the chaos unfold. The pushback isn’t just online theatrics. Stanley Druckenmiller (Trades, Portfolio) took to social media to say he does not support tariffs exceeding 10%, a direct challenge to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent his former protege who’s now doubling down on the strategy he once dismissed. And the chorus is growing. Yardeni Research blasted Navarro’s recent TV appearance, saying it made them gag on [their] bagel. With financial leaders breaking ranks, investor sentiment is shifting fast. Confidence in the administration’s economic direction? Hanging by a thread.
Rice crisis: Japan releases strategic reserves to ease prices of nation’s most important food

It’s eaten with almost every meal, used to make sushi, made into sweets, fermented into alcohol and offered to the spirits at religious ceremonies.

Rice is everywhere in the diet of Japan – there are at least six ways in Japanese to describe the grain, from unhusked to ready to eat. It’s so popular that McDonald’s there added a burger bun made of rice to its menu.

But being so reliant on the staple leaves the country – the world’s fourth-biggest economy – vulnerable to the slightest supply glitch.

In recent years, a combination of bad weather, heatwaves and the threats of typhoons and earthquakes have sparked bouts of panic-buying in the nation of 124 million people.

The average price of a 60-kilogram bag rose to around $160 last year – up 55 per cent compared to two years ago, according to government figures.

The situation has become so dire that the government announced in February that it would release 210,000 tons of rice – more than a fifth of what it holds in its contingency reserve – for auction. The first bags of the reserve rice have now gone on sale in supermarkets.

The government built its rice reserve in 1995, two years after an unexpected cool summer crippled rice harvests forcing it to import overseas grains.

It dipped into the store following the 2011 earthquake and tsunami in which 20,000 people died or went missing, and again following the deadly Kumamoto earthquake in 2016.

Other countries across Asia where rice is a staple, such as India, Vietnam and Thailand also hold rice stockpiles to shield their populations against shortages and price rises – which can spill into politics, like a recent surge in egg prices in the United States.

China also has a strategic reserve of the country’s favorite meat, pork, to deal with emergencies and stabilize prices when necessary.

In Japan, the first batch of 150,000 tons of rice went under the hammer last month, according to the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries.

“Prices now are exceptionally high,” Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Minister Taku Eto said ahead of the auction.

“But I urge everyone not to worry,” he added, saying that he expected the injection of rice into the market would mean prices “eventually come down.”

Eto also attributed the recent price hikes to a supply chain issue, saying that there was sufficient rice in the system, only that it has failed to reach the shelves in supermarkets, without specifying why.

On Wednesday, Trial Holdings, which runs a chain of discounted supermarkets in the southern island of Kyushu, confirmed to CNN that the first batch of auctioned rice has hit the shelves at some of their stores.

But, in a country that is particular about its rice – with various prefectures competing against one another for the title of best rice in the country – some said they would rather sit this batch out, skeptical of the grain’s quality.

“I do not intend to buy it because I have heard that it is old rice. I am still very particular about rice,” housewife Emi Uchibori, 69, told CNN.

Uchibori said she stocked up on supplies in early March after reading about prices going up and hoped what she had would last until prices ease.

“But it doesn’t look like it will go back to its original price,” she said.

Yuko Takiguchi, 53, a part time worker, said she would pass on the auctioned rice unless it became significantly cheaper.

She said she wouldn’t mind forking out more for quality rice as the price of flour had also gone up, driving up costs for other staples such as bread, udon and pasta.

“I prefer rice as a staple food since it is more filling. Also, since I have school-age children, rice is essential for their lunch boxes,” she said.

Social Security’s 2026 COLA estimate is climbing, but there’s a catch

For an overwhelming majority of retired workers, Social Security is more than just a monthly check. It represents a financial lifeline that they’d struggle to make do without.

Since 2002, national pollster Gallup has surveyed retirees annually to determine how reliant they are on the Social Security income they receive. During this 23-year period, 80% to 90% of retirees have responded that Social Security represents a “major” or “minor” source of income. Long story short, it’s a payout that provides a financial foundation for retired workers.

Taking into account how critical Social Security checks are for our nation’s aging workforce, no announcement has more gravity to the program’s 52 million retired workers than the annual cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) reveal. While early estimates point to the 2026 COLA climbing, there’s an unpleasant catch that comes with this forecast.

Why is Social Security’s COLA so important for retirees?

Social Security’s COLA is the tool the Social Security Administration (SSA) uses to fight back against a loss of buying power for beneficiaries.

For example, if a large basket of commonly purchased goods and services increases in price by 2.5% from one year to the next, Social Security benefits would also need to climb by 2.5% to ensure that retirees can still purchase the same amount of these goods and services. Social Security’s COLA is the mechanism responsible for attempting to match payouts with the effects of inflation (rising prices).

For the first 35 years that the SSA oversaw payouts, there was no rhyme or reason to COLAs. No adjustments were made during the entirety of the 1940s, which led to Congress passing the largest-ever cost-of-living adjustment of 77% in 1950. Only 11 COLAs were administered from 1940 through 1974, and they were all arbitrarily assigned by special sessions of Congress.

Beginning in 1975, the Consumer Price Index for Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) became the inflationary index used to calculate COLAs on an annual basis. The CPI-W sports more than 200 different spending categories, all of which have their own respective percentage weightings. These weightings are the key to whittling down the CPI-W to a single figure at the end of each month.

However, only CPI-W readings from July through September (i.e., the third quarter) factor into the COLA calculation. If the average CPI-W reading from the third quarter of the current year is higher than the comparable period of the prior year, inflation has occurred and beneficiaries will receive a raise.

When the prevailing rate of inflation shot higher four years ago, so did Social Security’s COLAs. U.S. Inflation Rate data by YCharts.

Social Security’s 2026 cost-of-living adjustment forecast is climbing

Cost-of-living adjustments have been something of a mixed bag for retirees over the last 16 years. The 2010s were a period of anemic raises, with deflation (falling prices) resulting in no COLA being passed along in 2010, 2011 and 2016 and the smallest positive COLA in history (0.3%) being registered in 2017.

This was followed by a big uptick in annual raises this decade. A historic 26% year-over-year increase in U.S. money supply, courtesy of fiscal stimulus during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, sent the prevailing rate of inflation soaring to a peak of 9.1%. The result was a 5.9% COLA in 2022, a 41-year-high 8.7% COLA in 2023, a 3.2% COLA in 2024, and a 2.5% COLA this year. For context, the average annual cost-of-living adjustment since 2010 is 2.3%.

Social Security’s 52 million retired workers are hoping for an encore that will lead to a fifth-consecutive year with an above-average raise — and they just might get it.

Following the release of the January inflation report by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), nonpartisan senior advocacy group The Senior Citizens League (TSCL) updated its outlook for Social Security’s 2026 COLA. After forecasting a 2.1% increase following the December inflation report, TSCL’s policy advisors are now looking for a 2.3% boost next year.

In January, the average retired-worker benefit check totaled $1,978.77. This means TSCL’s updated COLA forecast implies a monthly increase of $45.51 in retired-worker benefits for 2026. It would also firmly lift the average payout to retired workers above the psychological $2,000-per-month mark.

Although we’re still four months away from the first month that actually counts toward the COLA calculation, TSCL’s rising forecast bodes well, at least nominally, for retirees’ pockets.

Not so fast! Social Security’s climbing COLA forecast comes with a catch

According to the January inflation report from the BLS, the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), a similar inflationary measure to the CPI-W, rose by 3% over a 12-month stretch. This 3% year-over-year increase marks the fastest rate of inflation since August 2023 and explains why TSCL updated its 2026 COLA forecast.

But this headline figure only tells part of the story — and that’s the problem.

Retirees and working-age Americans spend their money differently. Whereas people in their 20s are likelier to spend a higher percentage of their monthly budget on things like apparel and education, seniors spend more than the typical working-age American on shelter expenses and medical care service costs.

In the January inflation report, the trailing-12-month inflation rate for shelter and medical care services (per the CPI-U) clocked in at 4.4% and 2.7%, respectively. Although shelter inflation has come down a bit in recent months, a significant uptick in mortgage rates has brought existing home sales to a crawl and afforded landlords exceptional rental pricing power. In other words, there’s not much of a catalyst to weigh down shelter inflation much beyond where it is now.

The issue for retired-worker beneficiaries is that their most important expenses are continually rising at a faster pace than the Social Security COLA they’re receiving. Even with TSCL forecasting a 2.3% COLA for 2026, shelter expenses are climbing at nearly twice this rate. If the 2026 COLA fails to surpass the prevailing inflation rate for shelter and medical care services, there’s a very high probability of retirees losing buying power.

Truth be told, Social Security income has been losing purchasing power for more than a decade. A TSCL analysis released in July 2024 estimates a 20% loss of buying power for seniors since 2010.

Unless the 2026 COLA forecast notably increases and the prevailing inflation rate for shelter/medical care services declines, retirees will be facing another year in which the purchasing power of a Social Security dollar withers.

Trump tariffs make billionaires lose combined $208bn in one day

As broad tariffs announced by President Donald Trump sent global markets into a tailspin, the world’s 500 richest people saw their combined wealth plunge by $208 billion on Thursday, Bloomberg reported.

The drop turned out to be the fourth-largest one-day decline in the Bloomberg Billionaires Index’s 13-year history, and the largest since the height of the Covid-19 pandemic.

With an average decline of 3.3%, more than half of those tracked by Bloomberg’s wealth index saw their fortunes tumble.

US billionaires were among the hardest hit, with Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg and Amazon’s Jeff Bezos leading the way.

Additionally, Carlos Slim, Mexico’s richest man, was among a small group of billionaires outside the US who escaped the tariffs’ impact.

Pushing Slim’s net worth up by about 4% to $85.5 billion, the Mexican Bolsa rose 0.5% after the country was excluded from the White House’s list of reciprocal tariff targets.

Following are some of the day’s biggest losers:

Mark Zuckerberg: With the social media company’s 9% slide costing its chief executive officer $17.9 billion, or around 9% of his wealth, the Meta founder was biggest loser in dollar terms.

Jeff Bezos: Costing the tech giant’s founder $15.9 billion in personal wealth, Amazon shares plunged 9% Thursday, their biggest drop since April 2022. The stock of company is down more than 25% from its February peak.

Elon Musk: As lagging deliveries and Musk’s controversial role as Trump’s efficiency czar have hammered the electric-vehicle manufacturer’s stock, the Tesla CEO has lost $110 billion so far this year — including $11 billion on Thursday.

Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures plunge as Trump tariff rout set to escalate

US stock futures plunged Sunday evening, setting up Wall Street for another bruising day on Monday as markets braced for more fallout from President Trump’s fast-moving tariff policy.

Futures tied to the S&P 500 (ES=F) plummeted over 3%, while those on the tech-heavy Nasdaq (NQ=F) lost 4%. Dow Jones Industrial Average futures (YM=F) sank 2.5%, or around 1,000 points. Oil prices also dropped more than 3%, tumbling below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021.

Wall Street is coming off its worst week since the advent of the pandemic, shedding over $5 trillion in value as Trump’s plans to impose heavy tariffs on all US trading partners led to a sell-off of epic proportions. The Nasdaq Composite (^IXIC) entered into a bear market on Friday, more than 20% off its most recent highs, while the S&P 500 (^GSPC) moved closer to that threshold. The Dow (^DJI) closed in correction territory.

Trump has shown little sign of wavering in the face of Wall Street’s panic and international reactions. China already announced retaliatory tariffs, and the EU is readying countermeasures. The US’s new baseline 10% duties on most trading partners went into effect over the weekend, and the additional tariffs that Trump announced on so-called “bad actors” are set to be enacted beginning on Wednesday.

Administration officials defended Trump’s plans during appearances on Sunday talk shows. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent rejected the assertion that the tariffs could send the US economy into recession. JPMorgan on Friday became the first big US bank to project a recession later this year, as forecasters have in just days scrambled projections of a solid growth trajectory for the US economy.

Bessent, along with top economic adviser Kevin Hassett, claimed that more than 50 countries have reached out to begin negotiations, raising questions about logistical challenges with the tariffs set to go in place this week. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the tariffs would “definitely going to stay in place for days and weeks.”

Trump, for his part, showed no signs of backing down, saying late Sunday that markets may have to “take medicine.” He added that he was not intentionally trying to crash equities.

error: Content is protected !!